Additional Vedic References
By Amara Das Wilhelm
Hindu teachings are based on the Rg, Sama, Yajur and Atharva Vedas as
well as a vast array of corollary texts expounding their truths. In ancient
times, Vedic knowledge was orally transmitted but eventually put into writing
by Srila Vyasadeva at the dawn of Kali Yuga. These writings
include the four Vedas mentioned above as well as the Brahmanas, Aranyakas, Upanisads and
texts known as the “fifth Veda”: the various Shastras, Samhitas, Itihasas,
Puranas, Ramayana, Mahabharata, Bhagavad Gita, etc. Lord
Ganesha served as the celestial scribe in this enormous task. There are
furthermore countless other texts expounding on Vedic knowledge and subsequently
accepted as Vedic literature. These include the many sacred and revered
texts written throughout the ages by previous acaryas, perfected saints
and accomplished scholars.
People of the third sex are mentioned in nearly all of the literature cited
above. Descriptions of any detail, however, are less common and found
mostly in the texts presented within this chapter. Since there are no
real English equivalents for the Sanskrit terms napumsaka, shandha, kliba,
etc. and because these words cover such a wide range of different people, I
prefer to translate them simply as “third sex” or “third
gender.” These terms are less limiting and leave themselves open
to interpretation. In most cases, the third-gender personalities mentioned
in Vedic texts are not explicitly described as castrated, intersex, homosexual
or anything else and to assign specific terms to them when this is not clearly
indicated is speculative at best and incorrect at worst. I reject the
traditional Victorian terms “eunuch,” “neuter” and “hermaphrodite” because
they are not only archaic but also inaccurate and misleading. Similarly,
the single word “impotent” does not fully convey the meaning of
a third-gender man since one of the most common types—the homosexual—is
not considered impotent in the modern sense. The phrase “impotent
with women” is more accurate and the term “intermediate sex” is
also suitable in some cases. Lastly, it should be kept in mind that the
Vedic canon is extremely voluminous and new material is translated into English
every few years. While this chapter represents the bulk of Vedic literature
describing the third sex to date it is by no means necessarily complete.
Third-Gender Men of the Bhagavata Purana
The Bhagavata Purana, also known as the Srimad Bhagavatam,
is one of the most important Vaishnava scriptures. It was composed by
Srila Vyasadeva as his final commentary on Vedic knowledge and focuses on the
subject of God realization. The following verses from the Bhagavata Purana serve
as typical examples of the third-gender men (kliba, shandha, napumsa,
etc.) mentioned here and there throughout Vedic texts. The first three
recognize such men as a distinct category of gender:
Any cruel person—whether male [pums], female [stri]
or third sex [kliba]—who is only interested in his personal
maintenance and has no compassion for other living entities may be killed
by the king. (4.17.26)
Sometimes you think yourself a man, sometimes a chaste woman and sometimes
neither [na ubhayam]. This is all because of the body, which
is created by the illusory energy. (4.28.61)
The Supreme Personality of Godhead is not female, intermediate [shandha],
or male; nor is He an animal. He is not a material quality, a fruitive
activity, a manifestation or a nonmanifestation. (8.3.24)
In some of his last notes on the Srimad Bhagavatam (10.1, Notes,
p. 105), A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada mentions the third sex as follows: “The
word puman refers to any person, whether man, woman or in-between.” In
this instance, Srila Prabhupada mentions the third sex as an intermediate gender
situated between male and female rather than simply as “eunuch” or “neuter.” As
noted in Appendix 3, His Divine Grace was not at all satisfied with the latter
terms.
The Vedic third sex is similarly mentioned throughout the other Puranas. For instance, the Garuda Purana (2.32.29) states: “Whatever the sex of the child—whether male, female or third sex (napumsaka)—it is born in the ninth or tenth month.” The Varaha Purana (142.50) also mentions: “If this regime [of self-control] is practiced without devotion to Me (Krsna)—despite having knowledge and whether man, woman or third sex—it will not yield rewards.”
The next two examples refer to third-gender men as effeminate and unmanly. In
these instances, the subjects are not actually third gender but accused as
such as a matter of insult:
[Urvasi rebuked her husband, Pururava:] “Now I am being killed,” she
said, “under the protection of an unworthy husband who is actually
a member of the third sex [napumsa] although he thinks himself a
great hero…My husband lies down at night in fear, exactly like a woman, although
he appears to be a man during the day.” (9.14.28-29)
[Pradyumna said:] “Except for Me, no one born in the Yadu dynasty has
ever been known to abandon the battlefield. My reputation has now been
stained by a driver who thinks like a member of the third sex [kliba]…Certainly
My sisters-in-law will laugh at Me and say, ‘O hero, tell us how in the
world Your enemies induced You to become so unmanly.’” (10.76.29,
31)
The Vishnu Purana contains a similar narration involving Garga Muni,
the head priest of the Yadu Dynasty, who was ridiculed by the Yadavas as belonging
to the third sex. Infuriated by their laughter, Garga vowed to beget
a son who would terrorize the Yadus with the fury of Siva. Such a son,
Kalayavana, was indeed begotten by the muni through the wife of a
yavana king. This story is not directly mentioned in the Bhagavata
Purana but often cited in relation to Kalayavana’s attack on Lord
Krsna’s capital city of Mathura (10.50.43-48).
The following verse from the Bhagavata Purana serves as a good example
of homosexual behavior that does not involve third-gender men:
Lord Brahma then gave birth to the demons from his buttocks, and they were
very fond of sex. Because they were too lustful, they approached
him for copulation. (3.20.23)
In his essay, Vaishnava
Moral Theology and Its Application on the Issue of Homosexuality (2005),
Hridayananda Goswami presents a thorough analysis of this verse in its entire
context (3.20.23-37), referring to commentaries from well-known Vaishnava acaryas such
as Sridhara Swami, Vira Raghavacarya and Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura. All
three acaryas agree
that the demons were in fact lusty after women, as described at the end of
the narration, and do not mention them as homosexual by nature. Hridayananda
Goswami writes: “The godless demons who chased Brahma for sex were
apparently attracted to the specific part of his body that manifests female
beauty. Both in the Bhagavatam text itself, and in the commentaries
of the great Acaryas, we find unanimous evidence that these demons were actually
lusting after women…Therefore, it is clear that the demons had a strong
heterosexual appetite, as well as an ambiguous attraction to a lusty female
aspect of Lord Brahma.” It can also be noted that third-gender
terms such as kliba, napumsaka, etc. appear nowhere in
this narration. Thus, the demonic men of Srimad Bhagavatam 3.20.23
have nothing to do with the third sex or people born with exclusive homosexual
orientation.
A possible reference to bisexual behavior as a symptom of Kali Yuga appears
in the Twelfth Canto of the Bhagavata Purana (12.3.37), wherein it
is stated that men will reject their relatives and friends to instead “associate
with the sisters and brothers of their wives.” According to most
commentators, the word samvadah or “associating regularly” in
this connection refers to having sexual relations. Such men are also
described as strainah or “controlled by women.”
Lack of Specific Statements On Homosexuality
Many Hindu scholars have pondered over the lack of specific statements on
homosexuality in the most popular and commonly read Vedic scriptures. While
homosexual desire and behavior are clearly described in less familiar texts
such as the Sushruta Samhita, Narada-smriti, Kama Sutra, Kamatantra, Smriti-ratnavali and
so on, the more widely-read scriptures seem to ignore the topic completely. In
the essay cited above, Hridayananda Goswami further writes: “Srila Prabhupada
taught that we must understand the spiritual science through guru, sadhu and sastra—‘one’s
teacher, other saintly persons, and revealed scriptures.’ Srila
Prabhupada also taught unceasingly that his own ultimate qualification, and
indeed the qualification of any bona fide guru, is always to faithfully repeat
the teachings of Krsna as they are found in revealed scriptures. Thus
we must search the most important Vaishnava scriptures presented by Srila Prabhupada—the
Bhagavad Gita and the Srimad Bhagavatam—for specific,
explicit, unambiguous scriptural statements about homosexuality. The
result? There are none. Remarkably, neither the Gita nor the Bhagavatam gives
a single explicit reference to mutually consensual homosexuality…Thus
according to Krsna’s own statement, since we do not find a specific,
explicit, unambiguous set of rules for dealing with homosexuality, we must
engage in spiritual reasoning about it.”
Of course, employing spiritual reasoning does not exclude us from considering
the less-familiar Vedic texts mentioned above, which in fact can be quite helpful,
and the Dharmasutras themselves enjoin: “When there are no specific
rules in Vedic texts, Manu has said that one may follow the laws of one’s
region, caste, or family” (Vasistha Dharmasutra 1.17). Nevertheless,
it is true that people with exclusive homosexual orientation are not specifically
addressed in any of the most important Vaishnava scriptures. The Bhagavad
Gita, for instance, does not mention homosexual behavior or the Vedic third
sex at all. Hindu scholars sometimes cite verse 7.11 as a condemnation
of homosexuality (“I am sex life which is not contrary to religious principles…”)
but this verse simply exalts religious sexuality as the highest representation
of Lord Krsna. Krsna also states in the Gita (10.31), “of fishes
I am the shark,” but this does not mean that all other species of fish
are therefore condemned and useless. The Lord Himself does not dismiss
people falling short of religious principles but instead encourages them to
remain in the fold by working for Him (12.10). Furthermore, the key criteria
of irreligiosity and social degradation cited in the Bhagavad Gita (1.40-43)
are the exploitation of women and subsequent unwanted progeny—elements
having nothing at all to do with homosexuality.
Since the major Hindu and Vaishnava scriptures are silent and consequently
neutral in their approach to homosexuality, perhaps our teachers would do best
to remain unbiased as well. Through this approach, sexual abstinence
and responsibility can be promoted equally across the board regardless of a
person’s sexual orientation or gender differences. Some of Srila
Prabhupada’s more memorable statements such as “sex is sex” or “what
is the difference if a person is held in this material world by a gold chain,
or by a silver chain?” illustrate this preferred approach, wherein no
particular class is demonized or excluded from the Vedic path.
The Dharma Shastra
The Bhavisya Purana states that the Dharma Shastra or scriptures
dealing in religious law and behavior were originally transmitted from Lord
Brahma to Manu at the beginning of the creation and later abridged into four
smaller texts by the sages Bhrgu (Manusmriti), Narada (Narada-smriti),
Brhaspati, Angiras, and others. The Manusmriti is the most prominent
of these texts and also known as the Manu Samhita. Its present
written form is dated approximately to the third century B.C. but was orally
transmitted for many thousands of years before that. The Narada-smriti is
lesser known and especially relevant to our study of the third sex since it
contains explicit definitions of the fourteen types of panda or “men
who are impotent with women.” The current written text is dated
to the first century B.C. and was particularly prominent in northeastern India
and Nepal. The Narada-smriti influenced early Buddhist concepts
regarding the third sex and can be traced as far eastward as Vietnam, wherein
twelfth-century inscriptions from the Kingdom of Champa mention a dignitary
in the court of Jaya Harivarman I said to have been a great scholar of the
text. Other Dharma Shastra texts include the Visnusmriti, Yajnavalkya-smriti and
various Dharmasutras composed by Vasistha, Apastambha, Gautama and
Baudhayana. The written Dharmasutras are similar or even older
in date to the Manusmriti but mostly consistent in their approach. Injunctions
regarding third-gender citizens are summarized in the sections below.
Defining the Third Sex: The first reference to the third sex
in the Manusmriti states: “As a third-gender man is unproductive
with women…so also is a brahmana useless who does not know the Vedas” (2.158). The
second reference describes the third sex as inborn:
A male child is produced by a greater quantity of male seed, a female child
by the prevalence of the female; if both are equal, a third-sex child (napumsa)
or boy and girl twins are produced; if either are weak or deficient in quantity,
a failure of conception results. (Manusmriti 3.49)
This verse is highly significant and repeated throughout the Vedic canon. It
establishes the third sex as an inborn nature rather than an adopted vice or
crime and subsequently all laws within the Dharma Shastra regarding third-gender
citizens are based upon this premise. The term “seed” refers
to the male and female reproductive fluids and hormones known as sukra and sonita,
respectively. Similar verses are found throughout Vedic literature; for
instance, in Chapter 48 of the Brahmanda Purana it is stated: “At
the time of conception, if the woman’s vaginal fluids exceed the amount
of semen the child will be female; if the semen exceeds, then it will be male. If
both are equal in quantity the offspring will be of the third sex.”
The next question is: What exactly is a napumsaka or third-gender
person? The Manusmriti does not provide this answer but the Narada-smriti gives
us a clue—out of the fourteen types of third-gender men listed as panda,
seven are declared incurable: the nisarga, vadhri, irshyaka, sevyaka, vataretas, mukhebhaga and anyapati. In
regard to these it is important to note that all seven are either clearly or
possibly homosexual, transgender or intersex and that only the first (nisarga)
would be recognizable at birth. The third sex is thus often known as “the
hidden sex” because it is commonly not identified until later in life.
Richard W. Lariviere’s translation of Narada’s text (The Naradasmrti,
2003) interprets three types of panda somewhat differently from those
mentioned in this book. Lariviere translates sevyaka as “homosexual,” vataretas as “one
who ejaculates prematurely,” and aksipta as “one who cannot
ejaculate.” In regard to the sevyaka as homosexual, this
definition is put forward by Bhavasvamin, an important eighth-century A.D.
commentator on this text. The Narada-smriti also mentions several
clues for testing a pandaka such as examining his physique, gait and
voice for masculine traits, seeing that his stools sink in water and observing
his urination as noisy and foamy (12.8-10). In Lariviere’s notes
on the testing of prospective grooms for impotence, he writes: “I translate
the term pandaka as ‘impotent’ rather than the conventional
term ‘eunuch.’ A eunuch would be easily identifiable by a
simple physical examination. The term must be taken to mean, broadly,
a male who is unable to impregnate a woman.” Herein Lariviere recognizes
that the term “eunuch,” as understood today, is not sufficiently
broad enough to convey the true meaning of a panda. It should
also be noted that, based on the different types of panda described
in the Narada-smriti, testing for male impotence would necessarily
include not only a physical examination of the man’s anatomy but also
a study of his interaction with women. Such a study using women is curiously
absent from the Narada-smriti although it is clearly given priority
in other Vedic accounts of the procedure.
Besides Lariviere, other modern scholars are also beginning to reexamine and
revise the traditional English translations of Sanskrit third-gender terms. To
cite an additional example, author Patrick Olivelle (Dharmasutras: The
Law Codes of Apastamba, Gautama, Baudhayana and Vasistha, 2000) defines shandha as “a
man whose sexual organs are lacking or have been removed” and kliba as “an
impotent or effeminate man.” While these definitions are somewhat
simplistic it is nevertheless encouraging to see modern authors reevaluating
third-gender terms and discarding the older, archaic interpretations.
Absence of Punishment For the Third Sex: Because the Dharma
Shastra considers the third sex to be an inborn nature rather than an acquired
vice, no verses punish third-gender citizens for their characteristic behavior. No
laws penalize third-gender men for refusing to marry women or conceive children
(quite the contrary) and no laws punish crossdressing, male prostitution, private
homosexual behavior, etc. A few ordinances admonish homosexual behavior
among brahmanas, twice-born men and unmarried girls but only mildly or under
specific circumstances. This attitude contrasts greatly with Western
religious codes that misidentify cross-gender behavior as an acquired vice
and punish it severely, even up to death. Indeed, the Dharma Shastra
texts verily forbid a king from using his weapon against a third-gender man
or kliba (Yajnavalkya-smriti 1.326) and declare that he must
never beat or even fine such a person (Narada-smriti 15.14-15).
Laws Admonishing Homosexual Behavior Among Brahmanas and Unmarried Girls: As
previously mentioned, the Manusmriti declares homosexual intercourse
involving brahmana or twice-born males (pums) to cause loss of caste
unless atoned for by a ritual bath (11.68, 175). These are the only statements
in the Dharma Shastra explicitly admonishing homosexual behavior among men. In
regard to women, the Manusmriti’s only concern is with the violation
of young, unmarried girls; typically aged eight to twelve years in Vedic times. A
fine of two hundred panas (small copper coins) plus double the wedding
fee, along with ten lashings, is prescribed for sexual penetration between
two unmarried maidens. If an adult woman is the violator, her head is
shaved or two fingers are cut off and she is made to ride through town on a
donkey (8.369-370). The same punishment of amputation is prescribed for
men violating young girls and there are no prohibitions against homosexual
relations between adult women. The Narada-smriti, Yajnavalkya-smriti and Dharmasutras offer
no specific injunctions against male or female homosexual behavior whatsoever.
Several verses in the Dharma Shastra admonish brahmanas, priests and twice-born
men that engage in viyoni or ayoni sex. Viyoni sex
refers to intercourse in a “base vagina” such as with a sudra woman,
a prostitute or a female animal, whereas ayoni sex refers to “non-vaginal” methods
of intercourse including using one’s hand, the mouth of another, the
thighs, the anus, etc. The Apastambha (1.26.7), Gautama (25.7), Baudhayana (3.7.1-7;
4.1.19; 4.2.13) and Vasistha Dharmasutras all admonish snatakas or
purified brahmanas who engage in viyoni or ayoni sex. If
these codes are violated, atonements are prescribed that include taking a ritual
bath, fasting, or reciting prayers. The Narada-smriti (12.75)
offers fines of one hundred to five hundred panas as an alternative
to such atonements whereas the Yajnavalkya-smriti (293) offers a smaller
amount of twenty-four panas. Brahmanas and twice-born men who
habitually break these religious codes lose their brahminical or twice-born
status (Gautama Dharmasutra 21.1).
Laws Prescribing Castration: Male castration is occasionally
mentioned in the Dharma Shastra as a punishment for heterosexual crimes involving
adultery and rape. The Manusmriti (8.374) and Gautama Dharmasutra (12.2)
recommend castration for a sudra who has intercourse with an unguarded
woman of a higher varna while the Narada-smriti (12.72-74)
prescribes the same for a non-brahmana who pollutes various types of respectable
women. The Apastambha Dharmasutra (26.19-20) ordains castration
when a young man rapes another man’s wife or an unmarried maiden. Voluntary
castration is suggested as the atonement for a brahmana who violates the wife
of his guru or some other elder. The Manusmriti (11.104-105)
and Yajnavalkya-smriti (259), as well as the Gautama (23.9-10), Baudhayana (2.1.13-15)
and Vasistha (20.13) Dharmasutras, all enjoin such a brahmana
to either embrace a red-hot idol of a woman or cut off his male organs, hold
them in his palms and walk toward the southwest until death.
No injunctions in the Dharma Shastra prescribe castration for third-gender
men and there are no accounts of castration as a voluntary practice among the
same. The Narada-smriti (12.12) defines the vadhri as “a
man whose testicles have been cut out” but offers no description of such
men or why they have been castrated. The earliest Sanskrit reference
explicitly linking third-gender men to castration—the fourteenth-century
A.D. Smriti-ratnavali’s definition of a shandha—comes
to us well after the arrival of Islamic influence in India.
Impotence and Marriage: The Manusmriti is silent on
the topic of marrying impotent or third-gender men to women but other Dharma
Shastra texts clearly forbid it. The Narada-smriti in particular
prohibits the marriage of homosexual and other types of impotent men to women
(12.14-18) and allows a woman to reject any suitor or husband lacking male
virility (12.37, 97). It presents clear guidelines for testing the potency
of men and identifies the fourteen types discussed earlier. The Yajnavalkya-smriti (1.55)
similarly states that the potency of a bridegroom should be “well tried” prior
to marriage and the Vasistha (17.20) and Baudhayana (2.3.27) Dharmasutras provide
one of the definitions of a remarried woman as “she who leaves an impotent
husband (kliba) to marry another man.” The Baudhayana
Dharmasutra mentions that the wife of an impotent husband may, with his
permission, get another man to impregnate her with a son; in such cases, both
men are considered legal fathers to the boy (2.3.17-18). Regarding infertile
women, the Baudhayana Dharmasutra declares that a man may dismiss
his wife if she does not bear him a child after ten years of marriage (2.4.6).
The eight
types of Vedic marriage or vivaha are listed and defined in the Manusmriti (3.20-34)
as follows:
- Brahma—the father gives away his daughter, covered with
costly garments and jewels, to a learned man of good conduct.
- Daiva—the father gives away his daughter, decked with ornaments,
to a priest officiating at a sacrifice.
- Arsha—the father gives away his daughter to the groom after
receiving a cow and a bull, or a pair of either, from him.
- Prajapatya—the father gives away his daughter as a gift
and blesses the new couple after showing honor to the groom.
- Asura—the groom receives the maiden after voluntarily giving
as much wealth as he can afford to her and her family.
- Gandharva—the maiden and her lover unite voluntarily, spurred
on by their desire for sexual intercourse.
- Rakshasa—the maiden is forcibly kidnapped from home after
her family has been killed or wounded in battle.
- Pisacha—the maiden is secretly violated and raped while
asleep, intoxicated, disabled, etc.
The Manusmriti considers the first six of these lawful for a brahmana
and the last four for a ksatriya. The same last four, with the
exception of the seventh, are permitted for a vaishya and a sudra (3.23). The Baudhayana
Dharmasutra (1.20.10) considers only the first four lawful for a brahmana
but then states: “Some commend the gandharva form of marriage
for all, because it flows from love” (1.20.16).
Verses throughout the Dharma Shastra extol marriage, procreation and child
rearing but also point out their illusory nature in favor of renunciation. To
cite one example, the Apastambha Dharmasutra provides two
interesting quotes in regard to not desiring offspring:
The eighty thousand seers who desired offspring went along the sun’s
southern course. They obtained cremation grounds.
The eighty thousand seers who did not desire offspring went along the sun’s
northern course. They, indeed, attained immortality.
(Apastambha
Dharmasutra 23.4-5)
Varnasrama-Dharma: The Vedic system of varnasrama-dharma or
social organization according to occupation (varna) and order of life
(asrama) is promoted throughout Vedic literature but especially in
the Dharma Shastra. The word varna is often misinterpreted as “caste” or “occupation
by birth” in English but the ultimate criterion for both varna and asrama is
factual qualification, not birth. The modern-day caste system of India,
based on birth alone, is a perversion of the original Vedic system and known
as demonic or asura-varnasrama. Divine or daiva-varnasrama,
on the other hand, is God-centered and based on a person’s true qualifications
and nature regardless of birth. To summarize, the four divisions of varna are
as follows:
- Brahmana—priests, teachers and advisors who are truthful,
self-controlled and learned.
- Ksatriya—administrators, officers and soldiers who are strong,
heroic and able to lead.
- Vaishya—merchants, bankers and agriculturalists who are
resourceful, efficient and enterprising.
- Sudra—servants, laborers and craftsmen who are humble, industrious
and loyal.
The four divisions of asrama or orders of life are:
- Brahmacarya—student life.
- Grhastha—householder or married life.
- Vanaprastha—retired life.
- Sannyasa—fully renounced life.
In Vedic culture, brahmanas are educated in the scriptures and trained to
uphold higher moral standards. They receive initiation or diksa into
the chanting of sacred mantras and are thus considered “twice born” or dvija. Ksatriyas and vaishyas may
also undergo such training if they are qualified but sudras generally
do not. Thus sudras, as well as uninitiated ksatriyas and vaishyas,
are not held to the higher brahminical standards outlined in the Dharma Shastra. Regarding
citizens of the third sex, under the daiva-varnasrama system they
can adopt any of the above occupations or orders they are qualified for. Under
the asura-varnasrama system, however, such people are excluded from
these and forced to live as social outcastes. This latter policy is especially
prominent in Kali Yuga and based upon bodily prejudice.
Legal Codes Specific To the Third Sex: Both the Manusmriti (9.201)
and Narada-smriti (13.20) exclude men of the third sex from receiving
family inheritance, due to their lack of progeny. If they “somehow
or other” manage to take wives and have children, however, the Manusmriti states
that the children in such cases are entitled to a share (9.203). Either
way, the family is required to provide maintenance to their third-gender offspring
in accordance with their income (9.202). These same injunctions are repeated
in the Yajnavalkya-smriti (2.140-141) and the four Dharmasutras: Apastamba (2.14.1), Gautama (28.43), Baudhayana (2.3.37-38)
and Vasistha (17.53-54). The Vasistha Dharmasutra further
states that a king should maintain third-gender citizens with no family because
their estates go back to him after their demise (19.35-36).
The Narada-smriti (1.159-171) prohibits people of the third sex,
along with countless other types, from testifying in court for minor but not
major offenses. It also forbids third-gender citizens from undergoing
the holy water ordeal as a test of innocence at trials (20.45). In the
holy water ordeal, an accused twice-born man drinks bath water from the temple
deity and if anything unusual happens to him within two weeks his guilt is
revealed. The Narada-smriti also states that people considered
impure by smarta standards—the uninitiated, their wives, impotent
men, the crippled, elephant drivers, butchers, outcastes—should be beaten
if they violate customary rules or offend virtuous men. They should not,
however, be beaten by the king himself or ever fined (15.12-15).
Smarta-Dharma: Smarta-dharma refers to the countless
rules and regulations followed by smarta-brahmanas (ritualistic priests)
and snatakas (purists). In regard to these, the Manusmriti prohibits
people of the third sex, along with many other types, from receiving sraddha offerings
from the forefathers and ancestral gods (3.150, 165). It also discourages smarta-brahmanas and snatakas from
receiving meals or attending sacrifices offered by such people (4.205, 206). The Yajnavalkya-smriti (1.223)
similarly prohibits third-gender men from performing sraddha ceremonies
and the Gautama (15.16) and Vasistha (11.19) Dharmasutras discourage snatakas from
inviting or even feeding third-gender men at such events. These smarta injunctions
are based on the idea that third-gender men and women do not appease their
forefathers or ancestral gods by producing progeny.
The Manusmriti (4.211) further enjoins smarta-brahmanas not
to accept food offerings from the third sex, as does the Yajnavalkya-smriti (1.161)
and the Apastamba (1.18.27, 1.19.14), Gautama (17.17) and Vasistha (14.2,
19) Dharmasutras. The Yajnavalkya-smriti (1.215-216)
and Vasistha Dharmasutra (14.12-13) prohibit snatakas from
accepting gifts from the third sex (shandha) unless they are used
for deities, guests, elders, servants or the snatakas themselves. A
verse from the Vasistha Dharmasutra (12.31) prohibits a snataka from
eating in the company of his wife because otherwise “his children will
lack manly vigor.” In a chapter on atonement, the Manusmriti (11.134)
states that a brahmana causing the death of a third-gender animal (shandha)
should atone for it by giving away a load of straw and masa (0.61
grams) of lead. This same atonement is cited in the Gautama Dharmasutra (22.23)
whereas the Yajnavalkya-smriti prescribes giving away brass metal
(3.273). According to the eleventh-century A.D. commentator, Haradatta,
a “third-gender animal” especially refers to castrated beasts such
as oxen.
Vaishnava-Dharma: According to vaishnava-dharma, most
of the strict rules and regulations cited above can be disregarded because
they consider only a person’s material body and not their moral or devotional
qualifications. Furthermore, injunctions that interfere with a person’s
worship of God can be rejected immediately. Vaishnava saint Srila Bhaktivinoda
Thakura expresses this important point in his book, Jaiva Dharma (1896),
as follows:
[A Vaishnava] never adheres blindly to the rules and prohibitions of the sastras [scriptures]. He
accepts the instructions of the sastras graciously, but only when
they are favorable to his practice of hari-bhajana [worship of God]. When
they are unfavorable, he immediately rejects them. (Jaiva
Dharma, p. 54)
To put the above-cited smarta-dharma injunctions into context, the
same texts prohibit snatakas from accepting gifts or foodstuffs presented
by kings, mayors, tax collectors, sudras, dark-skinned races, foreigners,
non-Aryans, goldsmiths, money lenders, weapons dealers, spies, physicians,
carpenters, artisans, performers, musicians, actors, basket weavers, tailors,
laundrymen, cloth dyers, leather workers, hunters, dog trainers, blacksmiths,
menstruating women, unchaste females, prostitutes, outcastes and numerous other
types in addition to the third sex (Manusmriti 4.205-221). These
people are also deemed unfit to perform or attend sraddha ceremonies
(Manusmriti 3.150-168) and are furthermore prohibited from testifying
in court for minor offenses (Narada-smriti 1.159-169). Thus
it is important to note that only mundane religionists—those on the lowest
platform of religious life—indiscriminately follow all of the exclusive
policies mentioned in the Dharma Shastra. Liberal-minded Hindus and Vaishnavas
automatically transcend such injunctions by viewing everyone equally and inviting
all members of society to worship God, receive offerings, present gifts, etc.,
regardless of body type or class. This is because true Hindu or Vaishnava
dharma has nothing to do with a person’s physical body or birth but rather
the welfare of the soul.
The Artha Shastra
The Artha Shastra or scriptures dealing in economic development and statecraft
were transmitted from Lord Brahma to the divine preceptors, Brhaspati and Sukracarya,
who in turn abridged these texts for mankind. The renowned scholar Kautilya,
also known as Vishnugupta or Canakya Pandit, preserved the Artha Shastra in
its present written form sometime during the fourth century B.C. As with
the Kama Sutra of Vatsyayana, Kautilya’s work dominates the
field in terms of Sanskrit texts representing the Artha Shastra. Whereas
Dharma Shastra texts address scriptural laws regarding brahmanas, the twice
born, court procedures and atonement, the Artha Shastra is primarily concerned
with economic guidelines, kingly duties, civil management, taxation and fines. Injunctions
from the Artha Shastra regarding the third sex are summarized in the sections
below.
Duties of the King: The Artha Shastra describes men of the
third sex serving as house attendants and harem supervisors (1.20.21), spies
(1.12.21), secret assassins (12.5.51) and servants to the king: “When
risen from bed, [the king] should be surrounded by female guards bearing bows
and, in the second hall, by third-gender servants wearing robes and turbans” (1.21.1). This
latter scenario is also described in the Valmiki Ramayana in regard
to Maharaja Dasaratha. Concerning spies, R.P. Kangle notes in his book, The
Kautiliya Arthasastra (2003), that the word pandaka means the
same as shandhaka. In regard to harem supervisors, the term
used is “varshadhara.” Varshadhara refers to
third-gender men who voluntarily withhold their semen from women, due to a
lack of desire. The Artha Shastra also discusses enemies of the king
and lists fourteen types of rulers declared easy to eliminate. Of these,
the thirteenth is an impotent king of the third gender (kliba) (6.1.13-14). Entire
sections of the Artha Shastra delineate ways in which intoxication (2.25),
meat-eating (2.26), prostitution (2.27) and gambling (3.20) are to be overseen
and regulated by the king. Also mentioned is the longstanding tradition
of all-male and all-female drama and dance troupes, along with several injunctions
regarding them (2.27.28-29; 3.3.21).
Significantly, the Artha Shastra considers it a crime to vilify men and women
of the third sex (kliba). If the person vilified is actually
impotent, a fine of twelve silver panas is imposed; if the person
is not impotent, the fine is twenty-four panas. For mocking
a person of the third sex in public, the fine meted out is thirty-six panas. The
mentioned fines are for persons of equal status; if the victim is a superior
or the wife of another, the fines are doubled. If he or she is an inferior
or if the vilification was committed by mistake, while intoxicated, etc., the
fines are divided in half (3.18.4-5). The Artha Shastra also mentions
three sources of proof used to ascertain a vilified man’s potency or
lack thereof in court: 1) women; 2) foam in the urine, and 3) the sinking of
stools in water (3.18.6). Similar but less specific injunctions against
vilification are mentioned in the Manusmriti (8.274) and Narada-smriti (15.19). As
with the Dharma Shastra texts, the Artha Shastra enjoins that an impotent man
of the third gender should not receive any share of the family inheritance. If
he somehow manages to have progeny that is not impotent, however, that progeny
can receive a share. The family must in any case maintain their third-gender
relatives with food and clothing (3.5.30-32).
Fines For Homosexual Behavior: Whereas the Dharma Shastra refers
to panas in terms of small copper coins, the Artha Shastra refers
to them as silver (2.19.2). Either way, a pana weighs one karsa or suvarna (9.76
grams)—the equivalent of sixteen masa beans or approximately
2 U.S. pennies. As previously mentioned, relatively minor fines are meted
out in the Artha Shastra for certain instances of homosexual behavior. Regarding
unmarried girls:
A young, unmarried girl deflowered by a woman shall pay a fine of twelve panas if
she was a willing party and of the same varna; the violating woman
shall pay double that. If the maiden was unwilling, the woman shall
pay a fine of one hundred panas—plus the girl’s dowry—for
the satisfaction of her passion. (4.12.20-21)
This verse differs from the Manusmriti, which prescribes either public
humiliation or corporal punishment for the same (8.370). Both texts offer
proscriptions only in regard to the violation of young, unmarried girls and
not for acts between adult women.
Concerning non-vaginal sex and male homosexuality, the Artha Shastra states:
For a male approaching a woman elsewhere than in the female organ, the lowest
fine for violence shall be imposed [forty-eight to ninety-six panas];
the same applies for one misbehaving with a man. (4.13.40)
This law most likely applies only to twice-born males (pums) if we
recall that the Narada-smriti (15.14-15) forbids the imposition of
fines on men who are uninitiated, impotent, etc. As with the Dharma Shastra,
no verses in the Artha Shastra specifically prohibit sexual behavior among
the third sex (i.e., using third-gender terms).
Various Other Laws: Crimes between heterosexual men and women
are punished quite harshly in the Artha Shastra. For adultery and rape,
the text prescribes high fines, branding of the forehead, amputation of the
fingers, hand, ears or nose, and death by burning in a fire of straw or cooking
in a big jar (4.13.32-33). Castration is meted out as a penalty only
in regard to incest (4.13.30) or if a person injures the genitals of another
(4.11.24). Furthermore, kings are specifically prohibited from castrating
any man captured during times of war (13.5.13). Abortion caused by a
blow is punished with the highest fine for violence (five hundred to one thousand panas)
or with the middle fine (two hundred to five hundred panas) if induced
through medicine (4.11.6). This differs from the Manusmriti,
which offers no punishment for abortion other than penance and the refusal
of libations (5.90, 11.88). Other Dharma Shastra texts, however, punish
abortion variously with banishment (Narada-smriti 12.92), loss of
caste (Apastambha Dharmasutra 1.21.8; Gautama Dharmasutra 21.9; Vasistha
Dharmasutra 28.7), public humiliation (Apastambha Dharmasutra 1.28.21)
or even drowning (Yajnavalkya-smriti 2.278). Child abuse is
also mentioned in the Artha Shastra and punished as follows:
For a male violating a maiden of the same varna who has not attained
puberty, the punishment is cutting off the hand or a fine of four hundred panas. If
the girl dies, the punishment shall be death. (4.12.1)
The act of suicide is similarly penalized quite harshly in the Artha Shastra: an outcaste
is made to drag the suicide’s corpse along the royal highway and relatives
are forbidden from performing any funeral rites. If they do, they are
regarded as outcastes themselves (4.7.25-27).
The Ayur Shastra
The Ayur Shastra refers to scriptures dealing in ayurveda or the
science of life, health and medicine. The two most prominent texts in
this category are the Sushruta Samhita, which is somewhat older and
more widely known, and the Caraka Samhita, a well-respected text among
Ayurvedic doctors and health specialists. Both books describe the third
sex in detail and declare it to be inborn and incurable.
The Sushruta Samhita: The Sushruta Samhita was
transmitted from the god of medicine, Sri Dhanvantari, to Sushruta—an
illustrious son of the sage Visvamitra. Sushruta put Dhanvantari’s
teachings into writing sometime around 600 B.C. and a brahmana of the name
Nagarjuna preserved it in its current form sometime during the fourth century
B.C.
In a chapter entitled “The Purification of the Male and Female Reproductive
Fluids” (3.2), the Sushruta Samhita lists five different
types of kliba or third-gender offspring that are described as inborn: asekya, saugandhika, kumbhika, irshyaka and shandha (3.2.38-45). The
first four are said to have semen and male characteristics (sukra)
whereas the last is mentioned without. In regard to the ayurveda concept
of sukra and sonita (the male and female sexual fluids and
hormones, respectively), these are often interpreted simply as “semen” and “menstrual
fluid” but they actually involve much more than just this. Sukra and sonita are
the sixth of seven dhatus or bodily constituents produced in succession
from the nourishment of food. The seven dhatus are: 1) rakta—blood;
2) mamsa—muscle; 3) medas—fat; 4) asthi—bone;
5) majja—marrow; 6) sukra and sonita—the
male and female sexual fluids, and 7) ojas—the life energy. Sukra masculinizes
the body and establishes the primary traits of male genitals and male neurology
in the embryo. It further manifests the secondary symptoms of manhood
during puberty such as muscle bulk, facial and bodily hairs, Adam’s apple,
a deepened voice, sexual arousal and the production of sperm and semen (retas). Similarly, sonita feminizes
the body and develops the primary traits of female genitals and female neurology
in the embryo. It further manifests the secondary symptoms of womanhood
during puberty such as breast development, enlarged hips, slighter muscles,
less bodily hairs and high voice, sexual arousal and the production of ovum
and menstrual fluids (artavam). Thus, sukra and sonita involve
not only the semen and vaginal fluids but also what we identify today as the
male and female hormones. This should be kept in mind whenever these
words are interpreted.
The unusual conception of a child between two women, without the help of any
man, is also mentioned in Chapter 3.2. Such infants are known as kalala and
described as thin, boneless and misshapen (3.2.47). The next chapter
in the Sushruta Samhita (3.3) is entitled “Pregnancy” and
describes the third sex as inborn:
The birth of a male child follows the preponderance of the male seed (sukra)
over the female (sonita), while the birth of a daughter follows the
preponderance of the latter. A third-sex child (napumsa) is produced
when both the male and female seed are equal in quality and quantity. (3.3.4)
In the second month of gestation, a round shape indicates the male sex of
an embryo while an elongated shape denotes the female. An erratic shape
like a salmali bud foretells an embryo of the third sex. (3.3.14)
A pregnant woman whose sides become raised and whose abdomen is found to bulge
out in the forefront will give birth to a child of the third sex. (3.3.20)
Chapter 2.12 of the Sushruta Samhita discusses various afflictions
of the male organ and their causes while Chapter 3.2 describes the different
healthy and unhealthy types of reproductive fluids in both men and women. Chapter
3.8 mentions that women and third-gender men (kliba) should not undergo
any type of venesection or bloodletting, while Chapter 6.38 lists twenty afflictions
involving the female organ (yoni) and describes their respective symptoms
and treatments. Four of these afflictions involve third-gender types: vandhya, putraghni, shandhi and sucivaktra. The
first two are considered curable in some cases whereas the latter two are permanently
sterile (6.38.5-8).
Chapter 4.24 of the Sushruta Samhita enjoins ordinary males
to keep healthy habits and have intercourse with their wives only according
to prescribed principles. Copulation with sterile women is said to be
detrimental to the semen and intellect whereas intercourse with animals, through
non-vaginal methods, or in diseased vaginas results in excessive loss of semen,
aggravation of the life-airs (vayu) and diseases such as syphilis
(upadamsa). Intercourse with the woman positioned on top is
said to cause seminal concretions in the bladder (4.24.89).
In a chapter of the Sushruta Samhita entitled “Male
Virility” (4.26), six different causes of male impotence are listed: 1)
the mind; 2) the diet; 3) excessive intercourse; 4) disease; 5) an inborn nature
(sahaja), and 6) voluntary suppression or utter apathy (4.26.3). Of
these, the fifth type is declared incurable along with any disease causing
permanent damage to the genital tracts. As for the rest, various types
of aphrodisiac tonics known as vajikarana are recommended
that instill great male potency.
In a chapter describing poisonous snakes and their respective bites, the Sushruta Samhita (5.4)
provides an interesting example illustrating that Vedic science also acknowledges
a third sex within the animal kingdom:
The eyes, tongue, mouth and head of a male serpent are large, whereas those
of a female snake are small. Snakes with both features, along with
milder venom and a less irritable disposition, are of the third sex (napumsaka).
(5.4.18)
The vision or the pupils of a person bitten by a male snake are turned upward,
whereas downcast eyes and the appearance of veins on the forehead indicate
a female snake as the attacker. A patient bitten by a third-gender
snake gazes sidelong. (5.4.25)
The Caraka Samhita: The Caraka Samhita was originally
transmitted from Lord Brahma to Prajapati Daksa, from Daksa to the Asvini Kumaras
and from those celestial physicians to Indra, who in turn handed the science
down to Atri Muni. Atri Muni passed the knowledge on to his son, Atreya,
and his disciple, Agnivesa, put the revered precepts into writing. The Caraka
Samhita in its present form comes to us from the illustrious physician,
Caraka, who preserved the original Agnivesa text sometime around 200 B.C. Approximately
one-third of the text was lost over time but later restored by a royal physician
of the name Drdhabala during the Gupta period.
In a chapter entitled “Embryological Development” (4.2), the Caraka
Samhita lists eight types of sexually impotent or napumsa offspring
considered inborn and incurable: dviretas, pavanendriya, samskaravahi, narashandha, narishandha, vakri, irshyabhirati and vatika-shandha (4.2.17-21). It
is important to note that only three of these types (dviretas, vakri and vatika-shandha)
are identifiable at birth; the remaining five are determined later on in
life when problems arise with sexual impotence. Unlike the works of
Sushruta, the Caraka Samhita does not explicitly mention homosexual
behavior; nevertheless, the renowned eleventh-century A.D. Bengali physician,
Cakrapani Datta, asserts in his commentaries that the word samskaravahi includes
the five types of kliba associated with homosexual acts and mentioned
by Sushruta.
A related chapter of the Caraka Samhita entitled “Formation
of the Embryo” (4.4) states that when the fetus of a pregnant woman is
situated on her left side and she experiences lactation in the left breast,
activity in her left body parts, womanly dreams, desires and so on, the child
will be female. The opposite from this indicates a male child and if
mixed symptoms occur, a child of the third sex (4.2.24-25). The Caraka
Samhita also mentions that the sex of the embryo becomes discernible during
the second month of pregnancy. If the embryo is round in shape, the child
is male; if elongated, female, and if erratic, the child will be of the third
sex (4.4.10). Furthermore, if the consciousness of the fetus is feminine,
female characteristics will develop during the third month of pregnancy and
likewise in regard to male characteristics if the consciousness is masculine. If
the consciousness of the fetus is both feminine and masculine, third-gender
characteristics will develop (4.4.14).
The same chapter of the Caraka Samhita goes on to state that when
the mother’s doshas (the three bodily substances known as vayu, pitta and kapha)
become gravely afflicted and affect her reproductive fluids, hormones or ovum,
that affliction is transferred to her child at the time of conception. When
the chromosomes (bijabhaga) are afflicted the child becomes sterile
and when the genes (bijabhagavayava) are afflicted the child will
be either sterile or develop mixed physical traits (intersex). Such a
female offspring is called varta and a male, trnaputrika (4.4.30-31). The Caraka Samhita also
mentions that if the mother continually eats pungent and spicy hot foods during
pregnancy, her child will become weak, deficient in semen, or sterile (4.8.21). Prior
to the third month of pregnancy, if the parents desire a male child but have
doubts regarding the sex of the embryo, they may perform the Vedic rite known
as pumsavana. According to the Caraka Samhita, wherein
this rite is fully described, the parents can actually change the sex of their
embryo from female or third gender to male with the successful performance
of this ritual (4.4.19).
Throughout Chapters 4.2-8, the sage Atreya explains to his disciple, Agnivesa,
how innumerable factors contribute to the physical and psychic composition
of the fetus. These include the child’s previous birth, deeds,
desires and state of mind as well as the parents’ own consciousness,
health and personal efforts (paurusha). To summarize in regard
to the third sex, the living entity is said to take shelter of a third-gender
embryo due to previous life impressions, deeds and desires. Such an embryo
is produced according to the activities of the parents, the course of nature
itself, and ultimately divine ordinance or daiva. If a third-gender
embryo is afflicted within the womb it becomes sterile or unusually formed;
otherwise, it develops normally and manifests as third gender only in terms
of the psyche (desire and behavior).
In a chapter discussing aphrodisiacs or vajikarana, the Caraka
Samhita (6.2) disparages men without progeny while glorifying those
who sire many children (6.2.1.16-23). It praises celibacy but cites
the practice as a cause of certain ailments if the candidate is not qualified
(1.7.10-11). The Caraka Samhita warns against excessive indulgence
in sexual intercourse and points out that a man’s potency is not necessarily
discernible through physical characteristics. It notes there are men
of small stature, weak constitution or debilitated by disease that are otherwise
highly potent with women and capable of begetting numerous offspring. Such
men “penetrate women frequently like sparrows.” On the
other hand, there are those who are impotent with women even though their
bodies are large, strong and “discharge semen as profusely as elephants” (6.2.4.3-5). Four
types of sexually potent men are then listed: 1) those who are potent according
to time and season; 2) those who become potent with practice; 3) those who
become potent by taking aphrodisiacs or extraordinary measures, and 4) those
who are potent like bulls by nature (6.2.4.6-10). The Caraka Samhita states
that men should not engage in intercourse before the age of sixteen or after
seventy and that semen is diminished by old age, anxiety, disease, masturbation,
fasting and sexual intercourse itself. Even if a man is full of semen,
the text asserts, he may be impotent with women due to various psychological
reasons such as wasting, fear, lack of confidence, grief, some fault in the
woman, ignorance of sexual enjoyment, lack of determination or simple disinterest. The Caraka Samhita states
that male potency is ultimately based on sexual arousal, which in turn depends
not only upon a virile body but also a virile mind (6.2.4.36-45). It
then cites seven symptoms of healthy semen (6.2.4.50) and provides numerous
recipes for making powerful aphrodisiacs. In regard to these, commentator
Gangadhara Raya states that the word purusa in connection with aphrodisiacs
indicates they are appropriate only for first-gender males—not women,
children, the elderly or men of the third sex.
Chapter 6.30 of the Caraka Samhita describes eight types of unhealthy
semen, their symptoms, causes and remedies (6.30.133-152). Four types
of male impotence are also cited: 1) those due to inborn causes or a complete
absence of semen; 2) those due to erectile dysfunction; 3) those due to old
age, and 4) those due to some deficiency in the semen (1.19.5, 6.30.154). The Caraka
Samhita provides a detailed description of each type along with their
symptoms, causes and remedies. In regard to the first category, this
type is declared incurable and further divided into three: a) the inborn types
previously described under napumsa; b) men whose reproductive organs
have been destroyed by disease, and c) men who have had their penis or testicles
removed. Concerning the inborn types, the Caraka Samhita states
that such men do not behave like males even though fully endowed with male
organs (6.30.154-190). In regard to men who have had their penis or testicles
removed, this is the only reference to male castration found in either the Caraka or Sushruta
Samhita and neither text provides a reason for the procedure nor any description
of it.
Chapter 6.30 lists twenty disorders of the female reproductive system that
are similar to those mentioned in the Sushruta Samhita. It describes
all of their symptoms, causes and remedies (6.30.1-125, 204-231) and cites
three types that involve women of the third gender: putraghni, sucimukhi and shandhi. The Caraka
Samhita asserts that the putraghni is sometimes curable whereas
the latter two are inborn and permanent.
In a section of the Caraka Samhita describing good conduct to ensure
one’s health and well being, the physician Caraka states that a man should
not make friendship with young boys, old men, the afflicted, or men of the
third sex (1.8.25). This unusual statement is not found in other texts
and contradicts higher Vaishnava teachings of becoming a friend to one and
all.
Third-gender snakes are also mentioned in the Caraka Samhita in a
chapter discussing poisons (6.28). Therein it is stated that such snakes
are identified as appearing “terrorized” when happened upon. Furthermore,
the victim of a female snakebite is said to look downwards, have a feeble voice
and trembling body. The opposite of this indicates a male snakebite and
if mixed traits are observed, a third-gender serpent delivered the wound (6.28.130-132).
The Kama Shastra
At the beginning of creation, Lord Brahma delivered the Kama Shastra or scriptures
dealing in sense pleasure to Nandi—the renowned companion and carrier
of Lord Siva. Nandi later imparted that knowledge to the sage Shvetaketu,
who in turn consolidated the teachings of the Kama Shastra into writing sometime
during the eighth century B.C. The renowned brahmana, Babhru, along with
his many sons, summarized Shvetaketu’s vast work and this summary was
later divided into several treatises during the third and first centuries B.C. It
was these treatises that were recompiled by Vatsyayana into the Kama Sutra,
the essential Kama Shastra available today. Lesser-known Kama Shastra
texts include the Kamatantra, Kokasastra, Nagarasarvasva and
several of the original works based on the writings of Babhru. The following
references to the third sex are found mostly within Vatsyayana’s fourth
century A.D. Kama Sutra.
The Third Sex As Inborn: While the Kama Sutra uses
the term tritiya-prakriti to describe the intrinsic nature of homosexual
and transgender behavior, other Kama Shastra texts provide more explicit descriptions
of the third sex as inborn. The Nagarasarvasva of Bhikshu Padmashri,
for instance, a tenth century A.D. Kama Shastra text from northeastern India,
discusses six major nerves in the vagina, two of which are known as putri and duhitrini (located
to the right, at the very bottom). In his commentary on Kama Sutra 2.2.31,
Devadatta Shastri quotes the Nagarasarvasva as follows: “By
stimulating putri, a woman stays young. With duhitrini she
bears sons, while with putri, daughters. If both centers are
activated at the same time, the child will be homosexual.”
Summary of Kama Sutra 2.8: The chapter of the Kama Sutra entitled Purushayita or “Aggressive
Behavior in Women” is a continuation of Chapter Six’s coverage
of exceptional types of intercourse known as citrarata. In the
practice of purushayita, the couple reverses roles (“woman on
top”) and the woman may also penetrate the man using her fingers or a
dildo (2.8.1-10). These same acts occur between women and Vatsyayana
uses a lesbian couple (svairini) to demonstrate the different techniques of purushayita,
including the eight types of aggressive penetration known as purushopasriptani. This
comprises the bulk of the chapter from verse 11 through 41. Since Chapter
Six (2.6.50) mentions that intercourse between men (purushopasripta)
is also covered in this section, it is taken that these techniques apply equally
to male couples.
Summary of Kama Sutra 2.9: This chapter, entitled Auparishtaka or “Oral
Sex,” describes men of the third sex (tritiya-prakriti) in two
different ways according to whether they appear as masculine or feminine. The
feminine types have womanly mannerisms and sometimes dress up as females whereas
the masculine types are manly and discreet, often serving as barbers or masseurs. Both
types are known to work as prostitutes. Vatsyayana uses a masculine-type
masseur of the third sex to demonstrate the eight techniques of auparishtaka and
his client is similarly a discreet, masculine-type townsman (nagaraka). After
describing the eight techniques, Vatsyayana mentions that low-class women also
perform these acts on men but stresses that it is not recommended. He
then discusses different regions in India that either accept or frown upon
oral sex as a practice between men and women. Returning briefly to the
third sex, Vatsyayana mentions young male servants who perform oral sex on
other men, as well as third-gender citizens who get married together out of
great attachment and faith. Then, continuing his discussion of auparishtaka as
a practice between men and women, Vatsyayana discourages males from performing
it on females. He describes an additional technique known as “the
crow” (simultaneous oral sex) but again discourages it, especially for
brahmanas and leading members of society. In conclusion, Vatsyayana leaves
the practice of oral sex to one’s own discretion, adding that we cannot
know who engages in it, or why.
Homosexual Marriage and “Parigraha”: Some scholars
question Alain Danielou’s translation of Kama Sutra 2.9.36,
which interprets the word parigraha as “marriage.” Like
most Sanskrit terms, parigraha has many different meanings such as “to
seize,” “to take in marriage” and “to engage in sexual
intercourse.” In her book, Love’s Rite: Same-Sex Marriage
in India and the West (pp. 46-47), Ruth Vanita analyzes this term and
concludes: “Parigraha, unlike vivaha (which is fully
sanctioned marriage) can be used to refer to different types of marriage, including
lower-status ones, and also to lasting bonds outside of traditional marriage,
such as those between a man and another man’s wife or those between a
courtesan and her long-term lover…the term parigraha refers
to mutual intercourse, but also carries the connotation of a union or bond
of mutual acceptance, such as taking someone in marriage.” Vanita
also mentions that in her review of the Kama Sutra she found parigraha used
eight times for “marriage,” five times for “to seize or obtain” and
six times for “copulation.”
Various Types and Lists: In a chapter of the Kama Sutra (1.5)
discussing intermediate or temporary partners, paramours in romantic dalliances
are said to be of five types: 1) the young, unmarried girl; 2) the widow or
divorcee; 3) the prostitute; 4) the consenting married woman, and 5) a partner
of the third sex:
To these four must be added the third sex (tritiya-prakriti), the
transgenders and homosexuals who have particular practices and constitute a
fifth category of sexual partners. (1.5.27)
In a chapter of the Kama Sutra discussing the stimulation of erotic
love (2.1), romantic desire is said to arise in four different ways: 1) by
continuous practice; 2) from deep within the imagination and without previous
experience; 3) by substituting an absent lover for another, and 4) under the
prospect of material gain. Regarding the second type, the Kama Sutra states
that such romantic desires concern women and third-gender men who engage in
practices such as auparishtaka (2.1.39-42).
In a chapter discussing appropriate behavior before and after lovemaking (2.10),
the Kama Sutra lists seven types of amorous relations: 1) those born
of physical attraction; 2) those produced by long cohabitation; 3) those feigned;
4) those substituted while thinking of another; 5) those formed without any
attachment or feeling; 6) those that are degrading, and 7) those without any
restrictions whatsoever. In regard to the fifth type known as potarata,
it is stated:
Potarata, or neutral sex, refers to occasional sexual relations due
to the need for sexual satisfaction, with persons of no account, water-bearers,
servant-women, men of the third sex, etc. (2.10.22)
The purport to this verse is that ordinary townsmen sometimes engage in relations
with third-gender men, not out of natural attraction or feeling but for easy
sexual satisfaction. Vatsyayana states that such behavior is not recommended.
Third-Gender Men and Women in the Gynoecium: Regarding polygamous
marriages, Yashodhara mentions in his commentary on Kama Sutra 4.2.43
that a remarried widow should report to her husband all of the misconduct of
her co-wives, including those “having relations with lesbians.” Verse
4.2.56 of the Kama Sutra states that queens of a royal harem “must
have servants or men of the third sex to bring the king flower garlands, ointments,
and clothes as gifts.” In a chapter discussing behavior in the
gynoecium or female apartments (5.6), amorous relations between the wives are
described as follows:
As a protective measure, nobody may enter the inner apartments. There
is only one husband while the wives, who are often several, therefore remain
unsatisfied. This is why, in practice, they have to obtain their satisfaction
among themselves.
The nurse’s daughter along with female companions and slaves, dressed
up as men, take the husband’s place using carrots, fruits, and other
objects to satisfy their desires. (5.6.1-2)
In verse forty-five of the same chapter, Vatsyayana cites eight causes of
misconduct among wives in the gynoecium, the seventh of which is “contact
with independent women or lesbians.”
The Kama Shastra and Vaishnavism: Some Vaishnava scholars dismiss
the Kama Shastra since it emphasizes worldly enjoyment over renunciation. Others,
however, value at least some of the information it offers, not in terms of
religious behavior but in regard to the practicalities of married life, human
sexuality and seldom-discussed topics such as the third sex. Indeed,
many Vaishnava acaryas refer to the Kama Shastra in their writings
and Lord Krsna’s gopi girlfriends, as well as some of His male
servants or sahayakas, are all said to be expert in its teachings. In
his Srimad Bhagavatam commentaries, A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
describes the Kama Shastra as “the science of sex” (4.25.38) and “the
scripture in which suitable arrangements are prescribed for factually glorious
sex life” (3.23.11). He also explains that Vedic literature offers
not only spiritual instructions but material ones as well and relates how Devahuti,
an exemplary Vaishnava wife, took advantage of the Kama Shastra for the purpose
of charming her husband and begetting good children. Thus in some instances
even Vaishnavas consult and utilize sections of the Kama Shastra.
Rites For Obtaining Same-Sex Love: Apart from the Kama Shastra, many Vedic texts provide rites and other mystical procedures for the purpose of obtaining love, increasing one’s sexual potency, making aphrodisiacs, love potions, etc. One of the earliest love rites mentioning same-sex desire is found in the Kaushitaki Brahma Upanisad as follows:
Now, regarding the intense longing of love stimulated by the gods:
If one should desire to become beloved of a man or of a woman or of men or of women, at one of these same points of time, having built up a fire, he offers in exactly the same manner, oblations of melted butter, saying:
“Your speech I sacrifice in me, you so and so; Hail!”
“Your vital breath I sacrifice in me, you so and so; Hail!”
“Your eye I sacrifice in me, you so and so; Hail!”
“Your ear I sacrifice in me, you so and so; Hail!”
“Your mind I sacrifice in me, you so and so; Hail!”
“Your intelligence I sacrifice in me, you so and so; Hail!”
Then, having inhaled the smell of the smoke and rubbed his limbs over with a smearing of the melted butter, silently he should go forth and desire to approach and touch [the person] or he may simply stand and converse with him from windward. He becomes beloved indeed.
(Kaushitaki Brahma Upanisad 2.4)
The Duty of Satisfying Women
A common theme found throughout Vedic literature involves the duty of first-gender
males to satisfy women in terms of lovemaking, marriage, sexual intercourse
and progeny. When a woman approaches a man for any of these he is generally
expected to comply or risk being viewed as a member of the third sex. A
prime example of this can be found in the Mahabharata story of Urvasi
and Arjuna, wherein the celestial apsara was extremely offended when
Arjuna refused her advances in lovemaking. Indeed, the Artha Shastra
(5.6.30) states: “A woman approaching a man of her own accord curses
him when refused” and Mohini-murti Herself declares in the Brahma-vaivarta
Purana: “Any male refusing to make love to a woman tortured by desire
is an impotent man of the third sex.” In the Yajnavalkya-smriti (1.81)
it is furthermore stated, “A man should take care of the desires of his
wife because Lord Indra has thus pronounced: ‘Any husband not addressing
his wife’s passion during her female cycle will fall into hell.’”
References From the Dharma Shastra: Dharma Shastra texts such
as the Narada-smriti clearly forbid the marriage of third-gender men
to women:
These four—irshyaka, sevyaka, vataretas,
and mukhebhaga—are to be completely rejected as unqualified
for marriage, even for a woman who has been raped. (12.15)
The four types mentioned above include homosexual men, particularly the sevyaka and mukhebhaga types
who have sexual relations with men and are completely unable to satisfy women
in terms of romance and intercourse. The Narada-smriti further
mentions that a girl may give up on a suitor if he has any of seven flaws,
the third of which is being an impotent man of the third sex (kliba)
(12.37). It states that it is not considered a punishable crime when
a man has intercourse with a woman whose husband belongs to the third gender
(12.61) and lists five “catastrophes” in which women are permitted
to take another husband: 1) if the husband disappears, 2) if he dies, 3) if
he renounces the world, 4) if he belongs to the third sex, and 5) if he becomes
an outcaste (12.97). Bhavasvamin’s eighth-century A.D. commentary
on Narada-smriti 12.14 further states that parents should be punished
if they marry off a third-gender man to a woman without revealing his “flaw.”
The Baudhayana Dharmasutra passes harsh judgment on any husband who
does not have intercourse with his wife during her fertile period, equating
such a transgression to the sin of having non-vaginal sex or, if three years
pass, an abortion. Similarly, a woman who suppresses her fertile period
out of dislike for her husband is equated to an abortionist (4.1.17-21). The
same text also mentions that if a woman’s husband turns out to be of
the third gender (kliba), she may either leave him to marry someone
else or obtain his permission to beget a child through another man (2.3.17,
27).
References From the Artha Shastra: The Artha Shastra (3.2.48)
also confirms that a wife may abandon her husband if he is an impotent man
of the third gender (kliba). Indeed, a marriage may be revoked
and the dowry returned if either the husband or the wife proves to be sexually “defective” in
any way. For giving away an impotent maiden in marriage, the Artha Shastra
prescribes a fine of ninety-six panas; if a groom marries without
mentioning his impotency, the fine is double that (3.15.12-15).
References From the Kama Shastra: In a section of the Kama
Sutra discussing how a man should relax his newly married wife, it is
stated:
According to the sons of Babhru, if during the first three nights the girl
sees the boy lying like a corpse, without talking to her, she may imagine that
he is a homosexual of the third nature. (3.2.3)
Yashodhara comments on this verse in the Jayamangala as follows: “Seeing
him silent and motionless, making no attempt, like a village idiot, the girl
says to herself, ‘How stupid I am. He is either homosexual or impotent.’ She
considers his lack of initiative an insult.” The purport to this
verse is that although intercourse is forbidden during the first three nights
of marriage, amorous games of other sorts are required or the girl will worry
that her new husband is homosexual. Vatsyayana reiterates at the end
of the chapter that women disdain men with a lack of initiative and become
wounded or hostile when they do not receive any signs of love (3.2.35). This
brings to mind the story of Bahucara-devi, who cursed her husband for marrying
her without any feelings of manly passion or attraction. Apparently,
even in Vedic times, third-gender men would sometimes marry women for deceptive
or ill-advised purposes and this was known even among young girls. In
a later section of the Kama Sutra it is stated that women with impotent
or third-gender husbands (kliba) look elsewhere for love and are therefore
listed among the twenty types of wives suitable for adulterous relationships
(5.1.54).
Courtesans and the Third Sex
Courtesans or ganikas have traditionally maintained close ties with
the third sex, not only as temple prostitutes but also within general society. When
Krsna arrived in Dvaraka, the Bhagavata Purana (1.11.19-20) mentions
that He was greeted by city prostitutes along with “expert dramatists,
artists, dancers and singers”—persons typically associated with
the third sex. The Kama Sutra (6.1.22-26) similarly
explains that a courtesan’s usual companions consist of male prostitutes,
hairdressers, entertainers, perfumers, garland-makers, and so on—professionals
also commonly associated with the third sex. Such men assist the courtesan
in selecting worthy suitors and the Kama Sutra states: “If
possible, the courtesan should first arrange for her suitor to make love with
a male prostitute” (6.1.24). This curious bisexual arrangement
is employed by the courtesan for the purpose of testing her suitor’s
sexual prowess before accepting him as a lover herself.
In Vedic culture, courtesans and third-gender men are traditionally associated
with public entertainment and knowledge of the fine arts. They are furthermore
viewed as auspicious signs of social prosperity and cultural refinement. Regarding
courtesans, the Kama Sutra states:
Prostitutes who are beautiful, intelligent, and well educated have an honored
place in society and are known as courtesans [ganika]. Kings
respect them and respectable people sing their praises; honored for their
art, they live in the sight of all. (1.3.17-18)
In his commentary on Kama Sutra 1.3.11, Devadatta Shastri
describes the Vedic custom of accommodating courtesans in society as follows: “In
Indian society, courtesans have always been respected, not only for their beauty,
their way of life, and their attraction, but also for their knowledge, their
usefulness, and their social role…In ancient times, princes and princesses
were sent to courtesans to learn the arts and good manners. Not only
were the courtesans respected, but their presence brought good luck. They
were known as the ‘faces of fortune’ (mangalamukhi).”
Part Six of the Kama Sutra covers the topic of courtesans
in great detail. In the sixth chapter of that section a list of nine
types of prostitutes, from the lowest in rank to the highest, appears as follows:
1) water carriers; 2) servants; 3) corrupt women; 4) lesbians; 5) dancers;
6) the wives of merchants; 7) divorcees and widows; 8) women living by their
charms, and 9) high-class courtesans (6.6.50). Prosperous courtesans
were valued members of Vedic society and contributed greatly to the worship
of temple gods and other public causes. The Kama Sutra affirms
this as follows:
Having temples and reservoirs built, setting up altars on raised platforms
to Agni, the fire god, giving brahmanas herds of cows and covered vessels,
arranging pujas and offerings to the gods, bearing the expenses involved
with the money they earn, this is the concern of high-ranking courtesans who
reap large profits. (6.5.28)
An entire chapter of the Artha Shastra (2.27) is devoted to the topic of courtesans
and how a king should regulate their trade. Prices are set according
to the woman’s beauty and various laws protect or punish courtesans in
regard to business-related transgressions. The superintendent of courtesans
or ganika-dhyaksa is enjoined to oversee all prostitution within the
state and provide maintenance to the male instructors (veshyacaryas)
who train young courtesans in the art of dancing, singing, lovemaking, music,
and so on. Such instructors also train the courtesans’ sons, known
as ganikaputra, to become chiefs among the actors, dancers and male
prostitutes (2.27.28-29).
Sikhandi and the Question of Gender Identification
The story of Sikhandi in the Mahabharata raises several interesting
questions in regard to gender identification. When Maharaja Drupada propitiated
Siva for a son, the god told him: “You will have a child that is both
female and male. Desist, O King, it will not be otherwise.” Sikhandi
was accordingly born a girl, raised as a boy and finally transformed into a
man by the boon of a yaksa or nature spirit. In his previous
birth, Sikhandi was a girl named Amba who vowed to kill the hero, Bhisma, after
he had ruined her life. During the battle of Kuruksetra, Bhisma refused
to fight against Sikhandi because he recognized him only as Amba or female—a
refusal that ultimately lead to his defeat and the fulfillment of Amba’s
vow.
The question raised by the above story is this: How do we ultimately recognize
a person’s gender? Is it merely by physical anatomy alone or should
a person’s subtle body and psyche—the neurological brain, mind,
inner identity, and so on—also be taken into account? And what
about liberated personalities? Are the six Goswamis of Vrndavana, for
instance, truly male or are they more accurately viewed as female manjaris in
the guise of men? Similarly, is Lord Vishnu as Mohini truly female or
is She simply a male Deity in disguise? The answer to all of these questions
is multi-faceted and according to perspective.
Another interesting aspect of Sikhandi’s story is the gender testing
he undergoes after transforming into a man. Sikhandi was married to a
woman while female and his wife discovered the secret shortly after their wedding. Enraged,
the bride’s father, Maharaja Hiranyavarna, demanded that Sikhandi be
tested to prove his maleness. Sikhandi agreed but only after receiving
his male form from the yaksa. Hiranyavarna consequently sent
a number of beautiful young courtesans to test his new son-in-law and they
all reported back to him, confirming that Sikhandi was indeed “a powerful
person of the male sex.” This brings to mind the pastime of Arjuna
as Brihannala, who was similarly tested by beautiful courtesans to confirm
his identity as a member of the third sex. In both cases, the gender
testing involved not only a physical examination of the men’s anatomy
but also an analysis of their response to beautiful young women.
Third-Gender Births As Purifying
A few verses from the Vedic canon refer to men taking birth among the third
sex as a means of purification. In such cases, first-gender males who
abuse women, or brahmanas who engage in prohibited sex acts, are reborn among
the third sex after suffering punishment in hell. One example has already
been cited from the Mahabharata (13.145.52) and a similar verse appears
in the Narada Purana (15.93-95). The latter text states that
twice-born males who deposit their semen in base wombs or places other than
the vagina fall into hell and are forced to subsist on semen for seven divine
years, after which they are reborn as “non-males” or neuters.
When these verses are taken in context we find that the subjects are addressed
as first-gender males (pums or purusha) and not as men of
the third sex (napumsa, kliba, etc.). Indeed, such
men are reborn as the third sex in their next lifetime. Furthermore,
the verses appear in sections devoted to brahminical standards of conduct. For
example, injunctions admonishing intercourse in a base or sudra womb
clearly do not apply to sudra men. Similarly, ayoni or
non-vaginal sex is a general prohibition for twice-born men and not those of
the lower classes. The Bhagavata Purana illustrates this point
in a comparable verse:
When, deluded by lust, a twice-born man commits the sin of causing his wife
of the same varna to drink his semen, in his next life he is thrown
into a river of semen, which he is forced to drink.
(Bhagavata Purana 5.26.26)
Again, only twice-born men are condemned in this verse and the wife must furthermore
belong to the same varna or class. Men who are not twice born,
or instances involving lower-class wives, are clearly excluded. Verses
admonishing twice-born householders who engage in oral sex appear throughout
the Dharma Shastra; for example, in a chapter describing proper behavior for snatakas,
the Vasistha Dharmasutra states:
If a [snataka] performs the sex act in the mouth of the woman he
has married, during that month his ancestors will feed on his semen. Sexual
intercourse performed without transgressing (the vagina) is in conformity
with the Law.
(Vasistha
Dharmasutra 12.23)
Clearly, these verses and others like them are intended for married, twice-born
males following higher standards of religious life. That they should
automatically be extended to uninitiated men of the lower classes or unmarried
homosexuals belonging to the third sex is highly doubtful.
In addition to the above considerations it is important to differentiate between viyoni and ayoni sex. Viyoni sex
generally refers to forbidden types of vaginal intercourse whereas ayoni involves
non-vaginal methods. The latter term includes male homosexuality but
not the former, and while the Narada Purana employs both terms the Mahabharata uses
only viyoni. Thus it is crucial to analyze the exact wording
and context of every verse, particularly those deemed controversial or contentious.
Another interesting point to consider is this: Exactly what type of third-gender
person is the offender reborn as? Since words such as napumsa and kliba are
umbrella terms for many different types of impotent men, it is not clear if
the next birth includes all of these types or only specific ones. In
the case of Mahabharata 13.145.52, the context involves severe physical
handicaps such as blindness, chronic illness, etc. and therefore most likely
refers to people born with absent or deformed genitalia. This argument
is strengthened if we consider how sex crimes such as adultery and rape are
punished with castration in the Dharma Shastra. Similarly, in the story
of goddess Bahucara, men who rape women or deceive them in marriage are cursed
to become castrated crossdressers.
Some scholars opine that the third-gender birth mentioned in these verses
must necessarily be homosexual—a stance typically adopted by anti-gay
scholars and one of the few instances in which they agree to translate third-gender
terms in this way. Yet another viewpoint holds that the offender takes
birth as a homosexual, transgender or intersex person according to the severity
of their sin, with a homosexual birth being somewhat purifying, a transgender
birth more purifying and an intersex birth the most purifying of all. In
any case, third-gender births are clearly portrayed as purifying in Vedic literature,
especially in regard to men who violate women or twice-born males who deviate
from the higher standards expected of them.
It is important to note that people take birth for a multitude of different
reasons and therefore not all third-gender births are necessarily the result
of bad karma or previous sins. The laws of reincarnation are extremely
complex and kama or desire also plays a crucial role. We can
hypothesize that intersex conditions and complete transgender identity are
the result of bad karma since people do not desire to be born with deficient
or inappropriate sex anatomy. In homosexuality and mild transgender behavior,
however, a person’s sex anatomy and orientation are desired and thus
more likely a result of kama. It is also possible that people
who ridicule or mistreat members of the third sex will be required to take
such a birth themselves in order to experience the same. Whatever the
specific cause or origin, all births take place by the will of God either for
the purpose of purifying sin or fulfilling desire.
Unscrupulous persons sometimes take advantage of these so-called bad karma
verses in order to castigate people who are blind, crippled, impotent, etc.
and to dismiss them as sinful, lowborn or guilty of previous transgressions. This
is never the position of true spiritualists, however, who see only themselves
as sinful and feel the suffering of others as if it were their own. Such
saintly personalities deal with people based on their present qualifications,
not on presumed sins from previous lifetimes. They see God’s mercy
everywhere and know fully well that material disadvantages are often spiritual
blessings in disguise.
The Jyotir and Nimitta Shastra
In both ancient and modern Hinduism, astrology plays an important role in
every aspect of life from birth to death. Religious ceremonies, child
conception, birth rites, marital arrangements, business ventures, political
conquests, journeys, health concerns, funerals, etc. are all meticulously planned
according to the Jyotir Shastra or scriptures describing the science of the
celestial luminaries. It is therefore significant that people of the
third sex appear throughout Vedic astrology, particularly in regard to the napumsaka planets
Mercury and Saturn. Third-gender topics such as childlessness, aversion
to marriage, impotence, same-sex attraction and gender variegatedness are all
clearly included within the Vedic conception of the natural cosmos. Directly
related to the Jyotir Shastra is the Nimitta Shastra or scriptures describing
the science of omen reading.
General Indications: In the Jyotir Shastra, the following astrological
components are associated with the third sex: 1) the planets Mercury, Saturn
and Ketu; 2) the fifth, seventh and first houses; 3) the signs Gemini, Virgo,
Capricorn and Aquarius; 4) the third division or drekkana of any sign
(21-30 degrees); 5) the sign divisions or amsas ruled by Mercury and
Saturn; 6) the stars Mrgashira, Mula and Satabhisa, and 7) the non-luminous
planets Gulika (or Mandi) and Dhuma.
The strongest indicators of third-gender influence in a person’s astrological
chart will concern the three houses mentioned above. The fifth house
governs progeny, the seventh one’s marital partner and the first or ascendant
a person’s bodily constitution. When strong or numerous third-gender
planets lord over, occupy or aspect the fifth house, the native will be impotent
and childless. An afflicted eighth house can also indicate impotency,
especially in terms of damaging the native’s sex organs. When strong
or numerous third-gender planets lord over, occupy or aspect the seventh house,
the native will be neutral in regard to marriage and without a partner. Furthermore,
if strong or numerous male planets lord over, occupy or aspect the seventh
house in a man’s chart, attraction toward male partners is indicated
and vice versa in a woman’s. When strong or numerous third-gender
planets lord over, occupy or aspect the first house, the native is likely to
be third gender by constitution. Additionally, if strong or numerous
male planets lord over, occupy or aspect the first house in a woman’s
chart, a cross-gender nature is indicated and vice versa in a man’s.
Third-gender indications can also be derived through inference, which is helpful
in cases where they are not specifically mentioned. For example, if a
prediction states that the native will have good dealings with people associated
with Mercury or Saturn, this can be understood to include people of the third
sex since they fall under the jurisdiction of those planets. These are
some of the basic points to consider when determining third-gender influences
in a person’s Vedic astrological chart.
Napumsaka Planets and the Third Sex: Mercury is the planet
most strongly associated with the third sex in Vedic astrology. It indicates
third-gender people who are intelligent and multi-talented in the arts and
sciences including everything from dancing, poetry, music, painting, fashion,
decorating, writing, religious observances, mathematics, alchemy, medicine,
and so on. Such people are also recognized as loyal servants and efficient
secretaries. They may be sexually active or celibate and are inclined
to the worship of Lord Vishnu. Their bodily features are attractive and
their spirits youthful and gay. They are gregarious, energetic and reaping
the result of previous good karma. Saturn, on the other hand, governs
third-gender people who are less fortunate in life, disrespected, poor, unattractive
and engaged in difficult or menial work. They are often solitary, melancholy
and reaping the result of previous bad karma. Natives of Saturn may be
of low character or, if favorably aspected, hard workers and devoted ascetics. They
are inclined to lower types of intercourse or are otherwise sexually impotent
and celibate. Those aspiring for material advancement and progeny are
drawn to the worship of Lord Brahma. Ketu’s association with the
third sex is emphasized mostly in the Jaimini system of Vedic astrology and
affects people in two different ways. When favorably aspected, natives
of Ketu are devoted to asceticism, occult practices and the worship of God
but when unfavorably aspected they are licentious, criminal or atheistic.
It is significant that the Jyotir Shastra assigns the third-gender planet
Mercury to the worship of Lord Vishnu. This is because Vishnu is transcendental
to all gender considerations. Saturn is generally attributed to the worship
of Lord Brahma although some later texts associate it with Sri Ayyappa, a Hindu
deity popular with the third sex and typically associated with asceticism. The
Sun and the Moon, as purely male and female planets, represent the worship
of Lord Siva and goddess Durga, respectively.
The Jyotir Shastra was transmitted orally in ancient times but written down
by great preceptors such as Vyasadeva, Bhrgu, Vasistha, Jaimini and Garga at
the end of the Vedic age. Many of the original texts have since fallen
into obscurity and only portions remain today. The essence of their knowledge,
however, was consolidated and preserved in later classics such as the Brihat
Jataka, Brihat Samhita, Saravali and so on. All
of these works acknowledge the third sex and references from some of the more
important texts are cited below.
Bhrgu Sutram: The Bhrgu Sutram is an ancient
Jyotir Shastra text attributed to the sage Bhrgu, a son of Brahma. Only
a small portion of the original text is available today, a section discussing
the effects of each planet within the twelve astrological houses or bhavas. In
regard to the third sex, the Bhrgu Sutram states that when
Mars is posited in the seventh house and aspected by Saturn, the native will “touch
with his mouth” the private parts of other men; if Mars is posited in
any house and associated with Mercury, the native will be impotent unless aspected
by a benefic planet (3.54-65). The Bhrgu Sutram further
mentions that when Saturn is posited in the seventh house and associated with
Mars, the native will likewise “kiss” the sexual organs of other
men using his mouth (7.35).
When Mercury is in the fifth house, the Bhrgu Sutram states
that it will be difficult for the native to conceive children since Mercury
is a third-gender planet and thus sexually neutral; if Mercury is weak or associated
with malefic planets, the native will have no children whatsoever and require
adoption (4.38-40). The same is true in regard to Saturn in the fifth
house (7.22). Ketu posited in the fifth or ninth house similarly indicates
childlessness according to Bhrgu Sutram verses 8.11 and 8.24.
Brihat Parasara Hora Sastra: The Brihat Parasara Hora Sastra is
dated to the end of the Dvapara Yuga (approximately 3000 B.C.) and
attributed to the sage Parasara Muni, a disciple of Saunaka Rsi and father
of Srila Vyasadeva. Specific references to the third sex in the Brihat
Parasara Hora Sastra are as follows: When Dhuma occupies the fifth house,
the native will be of the third sex (napumsaka) (25.3); the same is
true if Gulika occupies the second house (25.66). When the lord of the
fourth house occupies the eighth, the native will be “equal” to
a person of the third sex (24.44). If Venus occupies the seventh house
and is in a sign or navamsa (one ninth of a sign) ruled by Saturn
or aspected by that planet in any way, the native will “kiss” the
private parts of other men (18.13).
In regard to women, the Brihat Parasara Hora Sastra states that when
a woman’s ascendant (first house or lagna) and Moon are in male
signs, she will be masculine in form and bearing (80.6). If one of these
is in a male sign and the other in a female, the woman will have both male
and female characteristics (80.7). When her ascendant or Moon is in a
sign belonging to Mercury and she is born in a trimsamsa (one thirtieth
of a sign) of Saturn, the woman will be third-gender by nature (80.10). If
the ascendant or Moon is in Leo and posited in a trimsamsa of Mercury,
the woman will have masculine features (80.13). Should Mercury and Saturn
occupy a woman’s seventh house, her husband will be an impotent man of
the third sex (80.18). When a woman’s ascendant is Taurus or Libra,
her rising navamsa Capricorn or Aquarius, and the planets Venus and
Saturn aspect each other or occupy one another’s navamsa, “the
woman will be of great passion and satisfy herself through other females acting
as men” (80.50-51).
Nearly a dozen verses from the Brihat Parasara Hora Sastra refer
to astrological indications of childlessness (anapatyayogas),
which may or may not involve people of the third sex. For example, when
Mercury or Saturn governs the fifth house, which is also occupied or aspected
by both Saturn and Gulika, the native will find it necessary to adopt children
(16.9). In regard to worshipable deities, the Brihat Parasara Hora
Sastra assigns the third-gender planet Mercury to the worship of Lord
Vishnu and Saturn to Brahma (3.18).
Garga Hora: The Garga Hora is an astrological text
attributed to Garga Muni, the head priest of the Yadu Dynasty and contemporary
of Lord Krsna. As with the Bhrgu Sutram, only a small portion
of the Garga Hora is available today—a section dealing with
the indications of multiple planets in the twelve astrological houses.
The Garga Hora provides four alignments indicating people of the
third sex: 1) the Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury and Saturn posited in the fifth
house (527); 2) the Sun, Moon, Mercury and Jupiter posited in the sixth house
(614); the Sun and Mercury in the seventh house (676), and the Sun, Moon, Mars,
Mercury and Jupiter in the same (765). All of these indications are negative
in context since Mercury, in the presence of Saturn or other malefic planets
in multiple combinations, is said to produce harmful effects. Two additional
verses mention that a person will be impotent when the Sun, Mercury and Jupiter
are posited in the fifth house (465) and that a native will be “similar
to the third sex” when the Moon and Mercury are in the eighth (801). The Garga
Hora further notes that a native will be “devoid of manliness” when
the Sun, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter and Venus are all posited in the second house
(202) or if the Moon, Mars and Mercury are in the fifth (471). Eight
verses cite indications of childlessness, such as having the Sun, Mercury and
Saturn in the fifth house (467), and nine verses cite alignments indicating
lack of sex desire, such as having the Moon and Saturn posited in the sixth
house (564). Over a dozen verses cite planetary indications of having
no wife, a barren wife, or a barren daughter, such as having Mars, Mercury
and Venus in the fifth house (483). Thus the Garga Hora cites
numerous indications of the third sex, impotence and childlessness found in
Vedic astrology. Unlike the ancient works of Parasara and Bhrgu, Garga’s
text contains no specific statements regarding homosexual behavior.
Jaimini Sutram: Sage Jaimini, a disciple of Srila Vyasadeva,
compiled the Jaimini or Upadesha Sutram approximately five
thousand years ago. His unique method of calculating horoscopes represents
an alternative system in Vedic astrology although most of the qualities attributed
to the planets and signs remain the same. Mercury and Saturn, for instance,
remain third-gender planets under the Jaimini system and govern the same signs. Rahu
and Ketu, however, play a somewhat larger role. Ketu is viewed as a moksha
karaka (liberation indicator) and treated like Mercury in the sense that
it is considered benefic unless associated with harmful planets (4.4.24-25). In
regard to worshipable deities, the Jaimini Sutram states that
when Mercury and Saturn are with Ketu in the twelfth house from the karakamsa lagna (the
sign occupied by the birth ascendant’s ruling planet), the native will
be a worshiper of Lord Vishnu (1.2.76).
The first reference to the third gender in the Jaimini Sutram states
that when Ketu is posited in or second from the karakamsa lagna and
aspected by Mercury and Saturn, the native will be impotent and unable to procreate
(1.2.34). Indicators of childlessness under the Jaimini system are determined
when the planets Mercury, Saturn or Venus are associated with the seventh house
from the janma, navamsa, karakamsa, or upapada lagnas (1.4.24). In
a chapter dealing with the birth of children, the Jaimini Sutram states
that when neither the father’s or mother’s karaka (indicator)
conjoins or aspects the Sun or ascendant, the child born will be either illegitimate
or of the third sex; the same is true if the Sun or ascendant is six signs
away from the parents’ karakas (4.1.23, 25). In his notes
on these two verses, author Sanjay Rath (Upadesa Sutras, 2002) comments
that if Mercury is associated with the above-mentioned indications, the child
will be of the third sex rather than illegitimate. In a related
chapter it is stated that when the adhana lagna (the ascendant in
a chart drawn up at the time of conception) is in a navamsa of Mercury
or Saturn, the child will also be of the third sex (4.3.12). In his notes
on this verse, Rath comments that the planet Mercury indicates a third-gender
girl whereas Saturn, a third-gender boy.
In a chapter devoted to women, the Jaimini Sutram states
that when Mercury is in a trikona (fifth or ninth house) from the
woman’s navamsa lagna she will never beget any children
(4.3.79). Should Saturn be posited in the navamsa lagna, the
woman, although female, will behave like a man (4.3.84); similarly, when Saturn
is posited in a trikona from the navamsa lagna she will behave
like a man and be sexually passionate (4.3.85).
Brihat Jataka: The Brihat Jataka is one of
the most respected classics on Vedic astrology. Compiled in the first
century B.C. by Varaha Mihira, a brahmana of Avanti in central India, this
text is based on the earlier works of sages such as Bhrgu and Parasara. The Brihat Jataka assigns
the planets Mercury and Saturn to the third sex and declares their primary
deities or adi-devatas to be Keshava (Vishnu) and Kaha (Brahma), respectively
(2.5-6). In a chapter describing various types of pregnancies and births,
the Brihat Jataka mentions people of the third sex as follows:
When the Sun, the Moon, Venus and Mars occupy their own navamsas and
Jupiter is in the ascendant, fifth or ninth house (trikona), conception
will take place. When this combination is present among the impotent,
however, it is as useless as moonlight to a blind man. (4.3)
When the Sun and Moon aspect each other; when Mercury and Saturn aspect each
other; when Mars in a male sign aspects the Sun in a female sign; when the
Moon and ascendant are in male signs and aspected by Mars in a female sign;
when the Moon is in a male sign, Mercury in a female sign and both are aspected
by Mars; and when Venus, the ascendant and the Moon are all posited in male amsas—in
all six of these cases, offspring of the third sex (kliba) will be
born. (4.13)
The Brihat Jataka further mentions that a person will belong to the
third sex when the navamsa ascendant is posited in Virgo; if the birth
ascendant also falls in Virgo, the native will be a leader or chief among such
people (21.7).
In a chapter discussing Moon signs, the Brihat Jataka (17.3)
states that a native with the Moon in Gemini will be skilled in the science
of sex, fond of women, music and dancing, and sport with men of the third gender
(kliba). When the Moon is posited in Virgo, the native will
have few or no children (17.6). With the Moon in Capricorn or Aquarius,
the native will be attracted to lower types of intercourse and illicit relations
(17.10-11). In a chapter discussing the indications of other planetary
signs, the Brihat Jataka states that a native with the Sun in Taurus
will sell scented products and clothing, be clever in drumming or music and
dislike women (18.1). With the Sun in Virgo, a man will possess a feminine
physique and be skilled in the arts and sciences (18.2). Having Mercury
in Leo indicates childlessness (18.10) as does having Saturn in Gemini, Virgo,
Cancer or Leo (18.17-18). Varaha Mihira further states that the above-mentioned
indications also apply to a person’s ascendant (18.20). In the
succeeding chapter, the Brihat Jataka declares that having the Moon
posited in a navamsa of Sagittarius or Pisces and aspected by Venus
is an indication of impotence (19.7). Similarly, when the Moon is in
a navamsa of Leo and aspected by Venus, the native will be childless,
and when Venus and the Moon are conjunct in any sign with Saturn and Mars in
the seventh house from them, the native will have neither wife nor child (23.5).
In a chapter concerning women, the Brihat Jataka states that
a woman will be masculine in temperament and form when her ascendant and Moon
fall in male signs. If these two are aspected by malefic planets, the
woman will be sinful and without good character (24.2). When a woman’s
ascendant or Moon falls in Gemini or Virgo and occupies a trimsamsa of
Saturn, she will be of the third sex (kliba) (24.4). When her
ascendant or Moon falls in Leo and occupies a trimsamsa of Mars or
Mercury, the woman will be masculine in temperament. When her ascendant
or Moon falls in Capricorn or Aquarius and occupies a trimsamsa of
Venus, the woman will be childless (24.5). When Saturn and Venus occupy
each other’s navamsas and aspect mutually, or when the ascendant
falls in Taurus or Libra with the navamsa rising in Aquarius, the
woman will get sexual satisfaction from other females dressed in male attire
(24.7). When Mercury and Saturn occupy the woman’s seventh house,
her husband will belong to the third sex (kliba) (24.8).
Brihat Samhita: The Brihat Samhita is considered
by many to be the foremost treatise on the Nimitta Shastra. Compiled
in the first century B.C. by the same author of the Brihat Jataka,
this work is a vast collection of omens taken from various Vedic resources
and astrological texts. The Brihat Samhita declares
the planet Mercury to be the foremost ruler of the third sex along with people
expert in music, writing, comedy, perfumes, painting, grammar, mathematics,
medicine, sculpting, juggling, poetry, magic, message delivery, dancing, religious
ceremonies, and so on (16.18-19). It also associates Saturn with the
third sex although more in terms of impotence and lack of virility. Ketu
is rarely mentioned in the Brihat Samhita and not specifically associated
with any gender. In a section regarding the proper construction of Siva deities,
verse 58.43 mentions that “the left half of the deity may be made of
half the body of Parvati,” a clear reference to the divine form of Sri
Ardhanarisvara.
In a chapter discussing planetary conjunctions, the Brihat Samhita states
that when Venus overpowers Jupiter, people of the third sex “will suffer
great miseries” (17.21-22). The purport of this alignment is that
since Venus represents materialistic priests and Jupiter signifies those who
are magnanimous and equal-visioned, people of the third sex will naturally
suffer when the former types overshadow the latter. The Brihat Samhita also
mentions that it is a bad omen when a third-gender person is seen in the western
direction (86.46).
In a chapter describing planetary years, the Brihat Samhita (19.12)
states that people of the third sex will prosper during any year when Mercury
is lord, along with the other types of talented persons previously mentioned. A
planetary year is determined by whichever weekday falls on the new-moon day
of Chaitra (March-April), with Wednesday being the day governed by Mercury.
In a chapter concerned with reading omens through a person’s bodily
limbs (angavidya), the Brihat Samhita states that
if the querent touches his head or forehead, the question will involve a person
of the third sex or else end unsuccessfully (51.10). If the question
involves pregnancy and the same bodily parts are touched, a third-sex child
will be born (51.36). Two other verses from the Brhat Samhita foretell
the birth of a third-gender child: “If the woman’s blood exceeds,
the child will be female; if the man’s semen exceeds, the child will
be male. If both are equal, the child will be of the third gender. It
is therefore necessary to take aphrodisiacs for the increase of the man’s
semen” (76.1). “If the fetus is on the right side [of the woman’s
abdomen], the child will be male; if it is on the left, female. If a
fetus is on both sides there will be twins or, if situated in the middle, a
child of the third sex” (78.24). The Brihat Samhita also
mentions that if a man’s hand nails resemble the husk of paddy, he will
be of the third gender (68.41).
Concerning unusual births among humans and animals, the Brihat Samhita states:
If women should give birth to children of unnatural form, or if cows, sheep,
horses, deer or birds should do the same, or if leaves, sprouts or creepers
should be of unnatural appearance, there will be prosperity in the land. (46.95)
In regard to animals and birds as omens, the Brihat Samhita (86.8-9)
describes the distinctive traits of both male and female creatures and mentions
that some belong to neither sex. It states that animal omens increase
in strength and effect according to whether the creature is third-gender, female
or male, respectively (86.18). Conversely, third-gender elephants are
mentioned as inauspicious omens. She-elephants with male features, or he-elephants
found to be non-rutting, without virility or possessed of defective or extra
organs, are all said to produce misery and should be driven away to foreign
lands (67.9-10). The Brihat Samhita further mentions
that if an omen is observed involving a third-gender animal, along with certain
other occurrences, the native will meet up with a person of the third sex (96.9).
Saravali: The Saravali is a summary study of the Brihat
Jataka, written by King Kalyana Varma in the sixth century A.D. As
with other astrological texts it assigns Mercury and Saturn to the worship
of Vishnu and Brahma, respectively, as well as to the third or neutral gender
(4.13-14). In a chapter discussing the conception of children, the Saravali mentions
six astrological indicators of the third sex: 1) the Sun and the Moon are
in male signs and aspect each other; 2) Mercury and Saturn are in male signs
and aspect each other; 3) the Sun is in a female sign and aspected by Mars;
4) the ascendant is in a male sign and occupied by the Moon; 5) Mercury is
in a male sign and aspected by Mars while the Moon is in a female sign, and
6) the Moon and Mercury occupy a male ascendant and navamsa while
aspected by Venus and Saturn (8.18-20). Other indications of the third
sex mentioned in the Saravali include: having Saturn, the Sun and
Mercury posited in the same house (16.12); the Moon, Mars, Jupiter, Venus
and Saturn in the same house (18.15); the Sun in Leo aspected by Saturn (22.41);
Venus in Capricorn (28.20), and Jupiter in an enemy sign of Gemini, Virgo,
Taurus or Libra (45.19-21).
Further references to the third gender from the Saravali are as follows:
When Saturn is in Taurus or Libra and aspected by Mercury, the native will
be equal to the third sex (29.35). When the Sun, Moon and Mercury are
together in the ninth house, the native will appear like a person of the third
sex (32.53). When Saturn is in Virgo, the native will resemble a person
of the third sex (shandha) (29.11). When the Sun is in Capricorn
or Aquarius and aspected by Mercury, the native will have the nature of a third-gender
person (shandha) (22.60). When the Moon is in a navamsa of
Cancer and aspected by Venus, the native will be inimical to women and resemble
a man of the third sex (napumsa) (24.11). With Venus in the
sixth house, a native will greatly dislike his wife and, according to the Harivamsa,
be averse to sexual acts even in the presence of beautiful females (30.67). When
Saturn, the Sun, Mercury and Jupiter are in the same house, the native will
have the mannerisms of the third sex (17.18). When the Sun, Moon, Venus
and Saturn are in the same house, the native will have the mannerisms of a
female and be very weak or timid (17.10). When the Moon is in Leo and
aspected by Mercury, the native will have the characteristics and grace of
a female (23.31-36). When a man’s ascendant is in Virgo, he will
have a female’s disposition (48.22-25). When a man’s ascendant
is in the sixth navamsa of Aries, he will be soft in disposition,
timid and of the third sex (shandha) (51.7). When a man’s
ascendant is in the first navamsa of Pisces, he will be soft in disposition
and akin to a female in mind and behavior (51.101). When Saturn is in
Gemini or Virgo and aspected by the Moon, the native will do women’s
jobs; when aspected by Mercury, he will be a master of dance, art and song,
and if aspected by Venus, the native will be expert in beautifying women (29.37-42). When
Saturn is in Leo and aspected by Mercury, the native will do women’s
jobs (29.49-54). When the Sun is in Virgo, the native will have the physical
traits of a female (22.42). When the ascendant is in Cancer, a man will
possess a physique similar to that of a female (48.14-17). With the ascendant
posited in the third navamsa of Cancer, the native will have a soft
body akin to that of a female (51.31). According to Saravali translator,
R. Santhanam, having the Moon in the sixth navamsa of Cancer indicates
the native will be devoid of progeny, resemble a female in appearance and have
no moustache on the face.
In a chapter describing Moon signs, the Saravali states that if a
native has the Moon in Gemini he will befriend people of the third sex (23.16);
so also when the Sun, Moon, Mars, Venus and Mercury are posited in the same
house (18.2). A person will have dreams of the third sex if his temperament
is predominantly bilious and fiery (pitta) (38.18-19). When
a person is in his Mercury period and Saturn subperiod, he will strongly seek
out sexual gratification “like a third-gender man or a bull” but
be deprived of children (42.35). When Mercury is in Leo and aspected
by Mars, the native will be impotent (26.49-54). When Mercury is in Virgo,
the native will have little virility (26.12); so also when Jupiter is posited
in the sixth house (30.55). With Mercury posited in Capricorn or Aquarius,
the native will be impotent (26.19, 22). Similarly, a native will have
no children if Mercury is posited in Pisces (26.23).
Regarding the charts of women, the Saravali states that when a woman’s
Moon and ascendant occupy male signs, she will be male in appearance and disposition
(46.4). When Cancer is occupied by either the Moon or ascendant in a trimsamsa of
Mercury, a woman will have the nature of a male (46.6-10). Should the
ascendant occupy Taurus or Libra in a navamsa of Saturn while Venus
and Saturn aspect each other or exchange navamsas, a woman will unite
with another female taking the role of a male (46.14). When the woman’s
ascendant is in a male sign and occupied by Mercury, Venus and the Moon, which
are weak with a moderately strong Saturn, she will be similar to a male in
appearance and acts (46.29). When the Moon rules a woman’s seventh
house or its navamsa, her husband will be sexually tormented and soft
in disposition (46.21-24). Should Mercury or Saturn occupy a woman’s
seventh house, her husband will be of the third sex (46.15-17). When
Gemini or Virgo is occupied by either the Moon or ascendant in a trimsamsa of
Saturn, the woman will be impotent (46.6-10). According to R. Santhanam’s
commentaries on the Saravali, if a woman has Venus in the ninth house
she will be important in society, strong-willed and resemble a male (30.70).
Sarvartha Cintamani: The Sarvartha Cintamani is one
of the most important astrological texts of South India and was compiled in
the thirteenth century A.D. by a brahmana named Venkatesa Daivagnya. It
assigns Mercury and Saturn to the third or neutral gender and associates them
with the worship of Vishnu and Brahma, respectively (87, 89).
In a section discussing the birth of children, the Sarvartha Cintamani lists
nine astrological indications of the third sex: 1) the ascendant is Gemini
or Virgo, occupied by the lord of the sixth house and joined or aspected by
Mercury; 2) the ascendant is Gemini or Virgo and occupied by both Mars and
Saturn; 3) the Sun and Moon occupy male and female signs respectively and aspect
each other; 4) Mercury and Saturn occupy female and male signs respectively
and aspect each other; 5) Mars is in a male sign while the Sun in a female
sign and at least one of these planets aspects the other; 6) the ascendant
is in a male sign and occupied by the Moon while aspected by Mars in a female
sign; 7) the Moon is in a female sign while Mercury is in a male sign and both
are aspected by Mars; 8) the ascendant is in a female sign while the Moon is
in a male sign and both occupy male navamsas aspected by Mars, and
9) the lord of the ascendant is posited in the same house as Mercury with no
benefic aspects. The Sarvartha Cintamani states that in the
first indication both the native and spouse will be impotent; otherwise, all
of the remaining eight denote impotency for the native alone (199-203).
In his commentaries on this section, B. Suryanarain Rao (1856-1937) translates napumsa as “eunuch” and
defines it as “one who has not the virility of a purusha or
male.” He further describes such people as those with ill-developed
sex organs, nervous disorders or weak sexual appetites; those who are impotent
due to excess or abuse; those with “peculiar magnetic currents that keep
them away from the opposite sex,” and those who are sexually strong but
lose their potency with women after initial contact. Rao states that
all of these types occur naturally to varying degrees and equates napumsa to kliba,
which he similarly defines as “impotent men or women.” Rao
furthermore ponders: “Whether impotency is a curse or a blessing is a
delicate question that each man has to answer for himself.” Nevertheless,
he acknowledges that people in general view impotence as a curse.
Further references to the third sex in the Sarvartha Cintamani are
as follows: When the third house, its lord, and Mars are all posited in signs
or amsas ruled by Mercury and Saturn, the native will have siblings
of the third sex (428). When the lord of the fifth is Mercury or Saturn
and posited in a sign or navamsa of either, the native’s first-born
child will be of the third gender (636). When the lord of the sixth house
and Mercury join in the ascendant, the native will suffer from diseases of
the sexual organs (654). When the lord of the sixth house and Saturn
join in the ascendant with no beneficial aspects, the native’s sexual
organs will be amputated (655). When Venus and the lord of the seventh
house are posited in the sixth, the wife of the native will be of the third
sex (shandha) (656). Regarding worshipable deities, the Sarvartha
Cintamani states that a person will have devotion for goddess Sarasvati
when Mercury joins or aspects the fifth house. Should Saturn do the same,
the native will worship Lord Siva (996-997).
Jataka Parijata: The Jataka Parijata is another important
astrological text of South India, written in the fourteenth century A.D. by
Vidyanatha Diksita. Diksita is considered by many scholars to be the
son of Venkatesa Daivagnya, the author of the Sarvartha Cintamani. As
with other texts, the Jataka Parijata assigns Mercury and Saturn to
the third sex (2.27) along with the worship of Lord Vishnu and Brahma, respectively
(2.20).
In a chapter discussing various types of births, the Jataka Parijata provides
several indications of successful conception but states: “These planetary
conjunctions fail for those devoid of virility (vibijanam), just as
the Moon’s beams fail the blind” (3.13). It further adds
that when Mars and Saturn are in the seventh sign from the Sun, a man’s
generative organs will be afflicted with disease and become sterile. The
same is true for a woman when these two planets are in the seventh sign from
her Moon (3.14). The text declares that when a woman conceives on the
seventh night of her cycle (the first four being the time of menstruation),
the child born will be a barren female (3.18). The Jataka Parijata then
lists six planetary alignments said to produce third-gender offspring or kliba:
1) the Sun and the Moon are in opposition (purnima); 2) Mercury and
Saturn are in opposition; 3) the Sun is in a female sign aspected by Mars;
4) the Moon and ascendant are in male signs and both aspected by Mars; 5) the
Moon is in a female sign, Mercury in a male sign, and both are aspected by
Mars, and 6) the Moon, ascendant and Venus all occupy male navamsas (3.23). These
indications refer to the adhana chart, which is calculated according
to the time of conception. Verse 3.31 reiterates that when the Moon and
Sun oppose each other at the time of conception, they tend to produce a third-gender
child; so also in the case of the Moon and Saturn. The first indication
refers to a full moon or purnima and is a time forbidden to brahmanas
for sexual intercourse. Chapter Three also describes how Mercury indicates
the birth of twins and multiples; if these are not produced, then third-gender
children result and in such cases a prominent Mercury indicates the birth of
a third-gender girl whereas Saturn, a third-gender boy (3.30). The Jataka
Parijata similarly states that when the ascendant and sixth house lord
are posited in Gemini or Virgo while Mercury occupies the sixth house, the
child born will be a third-gender girl. Likewise, if the ascendant and
sixth house lord are posited in Gemini or Virgo while Saturn occupies the sixth
house, the child born will be a third-gender boy (3.33).
When Mercury, Rahu and the sixth house lord are all posited in the ascendant,
the fourteenth-century Jataka Parijata declares that such a native
will cut off his sex organs of his own accord (6.75). A similar verse
states that when the lord of the sixth house, Mercury and Rahu conjoin in one
house and connect in some way to the lord of the ascendant, the person will
be of the third sex (shandha) (13.71). A person born in the
year of Sukla will be effete (9.11) and a person born in the tithi of
Riktha will become barren (9.74). When the Moon is in Libra and aspected
by Mars, the Sun or Saturn, the native will be impotent (8.50) and when the
lord of the seventh house occupies the sixth with Venus, the native will be
impotent with his wife (13.72). When Venus and the Sun are together in
the seventh or first house, the native will have a barren wife; if the Moon
is in a male sign, his wife will have a masculine form, and should the Moon
be joined with or aspected by both male and female planets, his wife will have
both masculine and feminine qualities (14.6). When the seventh house
is occupied by the Sun, a native’s wife will be barren (14.11) and should
Ketu occupy the same, the wife will be barren but virtuous (14.13). When
the lord of the seventh or fifth house is strong, aspected by a benefic planet
and conjoined with or aspected by the lord of the sixth, the native’s
wife will acquire a son through her paramour. The husband himself, although
possessing many wives, will be childless (14.16).
Regarding women, the Jataka Parijata states that when the Moon and
ascendant are in masculine signs, a woman will be masculine in form and bearing
(16.7). When her ascendant is in Gemini or Virgo and posited in a trimsamsa of
Saturn, the woman will be a widow, have children that are stillborn, or possess
a third-gender form (kliba) (16.14). When the Moon or ascendant
is in Leo and posited in a trimsamsa of Mars or Mercury, the woman
will be masculine in disposition and behavior (16.16). When the ascendant
is strong in Capricorn or Aquarius and posited in a trimsamsa of Venus,
the woman will be licentious but barren (16.18). When Mercury occupies
a woman’s seventh house, her husband will be of the third sex (kliba)
and if Saturn is associated with Mercury in the same, the woman will be barren
or loathed by her husband (16.48).
Further sections of the Jataka Parijata state that when Mercury occupies
the fourth house, a native will enjoy the company of his spouse in theatres
or similar places of public entertainment; should Saturn, Rahu or Ketu occupy
the same, the places of enjoyment will be the favorite haunts of Sri Hariharaputra
or, in other words, forested mountaintops (14.40). When Mercury is the
strongest of four or five planets forming a kendra or trikona,
the native will become a jivaka—a mendicant that is talkative
and a voracious eater; if Saturn is the strongest, the native will attain the
stage known as vivasa—a naked ascetic dwelling in the hills
and forests (14.16). Regarding worshipable deities, the Jataka Parijata states
that when a person’s fifth house is occupied or aspected by Mercury,
his object of adoration will be Lord Vishnu. If the same occurs with
Saturn or Ketu, the person will worship various other deities (13.23).
Prasna Marga: This well-known astrological text was composed
in the seventeenth century A.D. by an unnamed brahmana from the southwestern
state of Kerala. The Prasna Marga states that if an
astrologer first sees an ascetic or third-gender person when beginning his
craft, the omen is bad (3.17). Similarly, if any of the five third-gender
consonants known as anunasika are first uttered at a query, the omen
is extremely harmful (2.107). The Prasna Marga also mentions
a curious type of third-gender devata or demigod invoked by another
god or brahmana to afflict the native. Such a third-gender devata is
indicated in a querent’s chart when Jupiter is posited in the sign of
Gemini or Virgo (15.214). In regard to worshipable deities, the Prasna Marga associates
the third-gender planet Mercury with the worship of Lord Vishnu and Saturn
with Lord Sastha or Ayyappa (24.12).
Concerning marriage, the Prasna Marga declares Mrgashira,
Mula and Satabhisa to be third-gender stars and states that when a man’s
birth star is feminine and a woman’s third-gender, or when a man’s
star is third-gender and a woman’s masculine, the combination is unfavorable
for marriage. Similarly, if the birth stars of both man and woman are
third-gender, the marriage is not favored (21.31). The Prasna Marga stresses
the following consideration in regard to all marital arrangements: “If
the couple loves each other they can enter into wedlock, even if there is no
agreement in other ways. This is very important in the matter of marriage” (21.54). When
third-gender planets occupy the seventh house and two planets occupy the eleventh,
the native will remarry (20.37). Similarly, when the sanatana-sukra (the
longitude of Venus multiplied by five) falls in a third-gender navamsa or
third-gender planets aspect this navamsa, the native will have to
marry three times before any child is born (18.146). Several verses in
the Prasna Marga mention indications of no marriage that may
or may not involve the third sex. For instance, when Saturn is aspected
by a malefic planet and posited in the seventh house, a woman will die a virgin
with no one ever agreeing to marry her (20.55).
Regarding childbirth, the Prasna Marga states that when the
chart of query (arudha) has the fifth house in a female sign and its
lord in a third-gender sign, the child born will be of the third sex (19.52). When
malefic or third-gender planets join or aspect a man’s bija-sphuta or
a woman’s ksetra-sphuta (astrological positions indicating male
and female potency, respectively), the strength of these is reduced (19.11). Nearly
a dozen verses from the Prasna Marga cite indications of childlessness;
for example, when Gulika occupies the fifth house, the native will be deprived
of all offspring (14.68).
Modern Prejudice In Hindu Astrology: In his book, Ancient
Hindu Astrology for the Modern Western Astrologer, James T. Braha writes
the following in regard to Mars occupying the seventh house: “Ancient
Hindu scriptures declare that the person will be ‘immoral and indulge
in sexual perversions such as kissing the private parts of another.’” The
problem with this quote and others like it is that the “ancient Hindu
scriptures” themselves only mention men “kissing” the private
parts of other men. The added expressions “immoral” and “sexual
perversions” are the work of modern Hindi and English translators. Unfortunately,
such biased renditions lead readers to assume that the great preceptors of
Vedic astrology were similarly prejudiced against third-gender people when,
in fact, their statements are neutral and contain no such derisive comments.
A thorough study of the Jyotir Shastra reveals that later texts become increasingly
inimical toward the third sex and are more likely to omit references about
them. While the ancient classics of Bhrgu, Parasara, Varaha Mihira, etc.
generously include third-gender men and women in their works and discuss them
in mostly neutral terms, modern Hindi and English texts typically omit these
references entirely, misinterpret them, cloak them under vague words or inject
mean-spirited and derogatory comments. Modern translators also limit
the third sex to physically deformed neuters and castrated eunuchs despite
all Vedic evidence to the contrary.
Regarding the use of derogatory terms, let us refer to the astrological indication
cited at the beginning of this section. Mars or Saturn in the seventh
house is a common indicator for male homosexuality in Vedic astrology and mentioned
in most of the major texts. The native is described “kissing” or “touching
with his mouth” the genitals of other men and the Sanskrit itself is
simple and nonjudgmental. Modern texts, however, either omit these indications
altogether or attach derogatory adjectives to them such as “unnatural,” “sinful,” “perverted,” and
so on. Books such as Mantresvara’s Phala Dipika and William
R. Levacy’s Beneath A Vedic Sky omit these references entirely
whereas G. S. Kapoor, in his Bhrgu Sutram translation, attaches the
phrase “sexual perversions” in regard to these acts. Worse
still, R. Santhanam’s translation of the Brihat Parasara Hora Sastra describes
the same-sex “kissing” as follows: “the native will have
ugly relations with another male, for subduing his mad lust.” Similarly,
in a section of the Saravali describing lovemaking between women,
Santhanam selects for his title: “Beastly Lust of a Female.” Such
derogatory renditions portray more the Victorian attitudes of their twentieth-century
authors than those of the Vedic acaryas themselves. Modern translations
of the Jyotir Shastra must therefore be carefully scrutinized for accuracy
and fairness in regard to descriptions of the third sex.
Third-Gender People As Omens of Good Luck: There are different
opinions regarding whether people of the third sex are omens of good or bad
luck. Such opinions reflect a person’s attitude about gender minorities
as well as their level of cultural refinement and spiritual advancement. In
general, people that view members of the third sex as symbols of bad luck tend
to emphasize their association with Saturn whereas those who see them as good
luck stress their connection to benefic Mercury.
In Vedic astrology, people negatively influenced by Saturn are described as
lowborn and unfortunate, particularly in regard to the hardships they experience
in terms of being unmarriageable, childless and socially disparaged. Thus,
in a material sense, ascetics and the impotent are associated with ill fortune
and considered bad luck. The Prasna Marga, for example,
states that if an astrologer first sees an ascetic monk or impotent man along
his path, it is a bad sign (3.17). The Sushruta Samhita and Caraka
Samhita also mention the same in regard to physicians. Mundane religionists
typically exaggerate these negative indications and use them as an excuse to
shun ascetics and third-gender people at all costs. They declare such
persons outcastes, refuse them offerings, avoid touching their shadows and
even spit at them as they walk by. Such prejudiced, shallow-minded people
are especially prominent in the present age of Kali Yuga.
Liberal-minded Hindus and Vaishnavas, on the other hand, hold a much more
positive and spiritually focused view of the third sex. They associate
such people with the planet Mercury and see them in terms of their many talents,
artistic abilities, cultural refinement, gentle behavior, efficient management,
dual-gender nature and connection to revered hermaphrodite deities. They
readily engage third-gender people in the service of God and society, invite
them into their homes for blessings, and award them with fine donations, opulent
foodstuffs, etc. Renowned Vaishnavas such as Jagannatha Misra and Maharaja
Virata, out of their natural magnanimity and kindness, exemplify this more
spiritually advanced point of view.
Yet another opinion is as follows: Since ascetics and people of the third
sex are powerful and potentially harmful portents according to the Nimitta
Shastra, it is better to invite them in and please them with offerings rather
than risk their wrath. This counteracts any possible bad luck and transforms
it into good fortune. From such a viewpoint, the third sex can be seen
as good or bad omens according to how they are received. If people of
the third sex are welcomed and treated kindly they bestow favorable blessings
and good luck but if they are neglected or treated with contempt they pronounce
curses and invite misfortune. In this way, Hindus and Vaishnavas hold
various opinions about the third sex according to their own character and level
of spiritual realization.
|