GALVA's Position On “Illicit Sex” and Renunciation
By Amara dasa

 

The following statements issued by the ISKCON Governing Body Commission regarding “illicit sex” nicely express the Gay and Lesbian Vaishnava Association’s (GALVA’s) exact same position:

The GBC Body wishes to clarify that according to Srila Prabhupada’s teachings, sex life according to religious principles followed by Gaudiya Vaisnavas is for the propagation of children, not for any other purpose, and that the responsibility of the parents is then to make their offspring Krsna conscious.  As stated in the Fifth Canto of Srimad Bhagavatam, “Sex is allowed only for the begetting of children, not for enjoyment.  One can indulge in sex to beget a good child for the benefit of the family, society and world.  Otherwise, sex is against the rules and regulations of religious life.” (SB 5.14.9, purport)

While Srila Prabhupada’s definition of illicit sex is clear, it is also clear that some devotees have difficulty maintaining this initiation vow.  The GBC recognizes this, and suggests that rather than trying to adjust Srila Prabhupada’s definition we should go on with devotional service and humbly and sincerely keep endeavoring to reach the proper standard.  In this regard, Srila Prabhupada writes, “In the beginning of Krsna consciousness, one may not fully discharge the injunctions of the Lord, but because one is not resentful of this principle and works sincerely without consideration of defeat and hopelessness, he will surely be promoted to the stage of pure Krsna consciousness.” (BG 3.31, purport)

It is also said in Srimad Bhagavatam 11.20.27-28, “Having awakened faith in the narrations of My glory, being disgusted with all material activities, knowing that all sense gratification leads to misery, but being unable to renounce all sense enjoyment, My devotee should remain happy and worship Me with great faith and conviction.  Even though he is sometimes engaged in sense enjoyment, My devotee knows that all sense gratification leads to a miserable result, and he sincerely repents such activities.”

(ISKCON GBC Resolution 303, Annual Meeting in Mayapura, India, February 7-19, 2001)


Sexuality is problematic in Vaishnavism since achieving liberation requires the abandonment of all material desires and attachments.  While the above standard of “sex for procreation only” may seem extreme or even impossible to many aspiring devotees, it should not be taken as a cause for discouragement.  In Krsna consciousness and daiva-varnasrama in general, there is a place for everyone whether they are renounced, fallen, or anywhere in between, and it is recognized that some devotees will be able to adopt the above standard immediately whereas others attain it gradually after years of devotional practice and purification.    

GALVA has always encouraged its members to engage in devotional service and renounce material desires as far as possible, according to their ability and nature.  This is best executed from either a celibate status or in something analogous to a heterosexual monogamous situation.  While many of our members practice strict celibacy, others find the latter situation more helpful and realistic for their advancement in Krsna consciousness.  Same-sex couples centering their household on Krsna and practicing celibacy together surely fall in line with the above-mentioned standard.  Similarly, any couple—gay or straight—having sex for purposes other than procreation is considered in breach of the standard.  Nevertheless, as mentioned above, such persons should continue in their service to Krsna despite “not fully discharging the injunctions of the Lord” or “sometimes engaging in sense enjoyment.”  By keeping the ultimate goal of complete renunciation in mind and continuing on with devotional service to the best of their ability, the sincere couple will gradually be promoted to the stage of pure Krsna consciousness.

GALVA believes that householder life and marriage are crucial components of Krsna consciousness that should not be denied to anyone.  In the Seventh Chapter of his book, Jaiva Dharma, Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura states that all living entities have the right to practice Vaishnavism and live as householders, even if they are outside of the ordinary varnasrama system.  He also describes how marriage is primarily for Krsna conscious partnership: “One should not enter marriage with a desire to beget children, or to worship the forefathers and Prajapatis.  It is favorable to bhakti to think, ‘I am only accepting this servant of Krsna so that we can assist each other in Krsna’s service and establish Krsna-centered family life together.’”  Bodily considerations such as gender or whether or not a couple will have children and sex are less important than the two principles stated above.  In ISKCON, for example, people who are sterile or beyond childbearing age are not prohibited from marriage, and neither are marriages terminated if they are childless or less than ideal in terms of sex.  GALVA believes that the same understanding and tolerance should be extended toward gay and lesbian devotees—their need for marital companionship in Krsna consciousness should be recognized and they can adopt children, etc.  This will be more helpful to their spiritual advancement than excluding them from marriage, encouraging artificial renunciation, or forcing them into unhappy and unnatural opposite-sex marital arrangements.  As the same-sex couple matures both physically and spiritually they can gradually transcend all mundane sexuality and attachment, just as other couples do.

GALVA acknowledges the reservations some devotees have about same-sex marriage based upon Srila Prabhupada’s initial reaction to the subject in the 1970s.  At the same time, it should be pointed out that Srila Prabhupada never discussed this issue in any detail with his gay and lesbian disciples.  We are reminded of when Srila Prabhupada first told his disciples to chant sixty-four rounds daily, but then later amended this to sixteen after listening to their feedback; or when he first granted brahminical initiation to men only, but then changed his mind and agreed to include women after hearing the pleas of his female disciples.  GALVA hopes the Vaishnava community will similarly consider same-sex marriage carefully, on a personal level, and do what is best.  There are also local considerations of custom and law.  In some countries, temples find it needful to acknowledge same-sex unions, at least on a congregational level, whereas in others they are obliged to deny them.  Similarly, some Gaudiya Vaishnava groups are favorable to same-sex marriage while others remain opposed or undecided.  GALVA therefore advises its members requiring same-sex marriage and householder life to seek out the most conducive environment and Vaishnava support possible.

 


 

©2006 GALVA-108