Homosexuality and Hinduism
By Ruth Vanita
Hinduism is the world’s oldest continuously practiced
religion and Hindus constitute a sixth of the world’s
population today. Most Hindus live in India but there are about
1.5 million Hindus, both Indians and non-Indians, in the U.S.A.
Modern Hindus regard all beings, including humans, animals,
Gods and Goddesses, as manifestations of one universal Atman
(Spirit). There is a Hindu deity and story related to almost
every activity, inclination, and way of life. Every God and
Goddess is seen as encompassing male, female, neuter, and all
other possibilities.
Hinduism and sexuality. Hindu texts have discussed variations
in gender and sexuality for over two millennia. Like the erotic
sculptures on ancient Hindu temples at Khajuraho and Konarak,
sacred texts in Sanskrit constitute irrefutable evidence that
the whole range of sexual behavior was known to ancient Hindus.
As Saleem Kidwai and Ruth Vanita demonstrated in Same-Sex
Love in India: Readings from Literature and History, traditions
of representing same-sex desire in literature and art continued
in medieval Hinduism as well as Indian Islam. When Europeans
arrived in India, they were shocked by Hinduism, which they
termed idolatrous, and by the range of sexual practices, including
same-sex relations, which they labeled licentious. British
colonial rulers wrote modern homophobia into education, law
and politics.
A marginal homophobic trend in pre-colonial India thus became
dominant in modern India. Indian nationalists, including Hindus,
internalized Victorian ideals of heterosexual monogamy and
disowned indigenous traditions that contravened those ideals.
Nevertheless, those traditions persisted, for example, in the
very visible communities of hijras, transgendered males who
have a semi-sacred status and often engage in sexual relations
with men.
Hinduism sees all desire, including sexual desire, as problematic
because it causes beings to be trapped in a cycle of death
and rebirth. Procreative sex, circumscribed by many rules,
is enjoined on householders, but non-procreative sex is disfavored.
Most Hindu texts assume that everyone has a duty to marry and
procreate.
However, Hindu devotional practice, philosophy and literature
emphasize the eroticism of the Gods, and Kama (desire) as one
of the four aims of life. In the earliest texts Kama is a universal
principle of attraction. In the first millennium C.E., he becomes
the God of love, a beautiful youth, who shoots irresistible
arrows at people, uniting them with those they are destined
to love, regardless of social inappropriateness.
Homosexuality and Hindu law. Ancient Hindu law books, from
the first century onwards, categorize ayoni (non-vaginal sex)
as impure. But penances prescribed for same-sex acts are very
light compared to penances for some types of heterosexual misconduct,
such as adultery and rape. The Manusmriti exhorts a man who
has sex with a man or a woman in a cart pulled by a cow, or
in water or by day to bathe with his clothes on (11.174). The
Arthashastra imposes a minor fine on a man who has ayoni sex
(4.13.236). Modern commentators misread the Manusmriti’s severe punishment of a woman’s manual penetration of
a virgin (8.369-70) as anti-lesbian bias. In fact, the punishment
is exactly the same for either a man (8.367) or a woman who
does this act, and is related not to the partners’ genders
but to the virgin’s loss of virginity and marriageable
status. The Manusmriti does not mention a woman penetrating
a non-virgin woman, and the Arthashastra prescribes a negligible
fine for this act. The sacred epics and the Puranas (fourth
to fourteenth-century compendia of devotional stories) contradict
the law books; they depict Gods, sages, and heroes springing
from ayoni sex. Unlike sodomy, ayoni sex never became a major
topic of debate or an unspeakable crime. There is no evidence
of anyone in India ever having been executed for same-sex relations.
Diversity in sex and gender. Hindu scriptures contain many
surprising examples of diversity in both sex and gender. Medieval
texts narrate how the God Ayyappa was born of intercourse between
the God Shiva and Vishnu when the latter temporarily took a
female form. A number of fourteenth-century texts in Sanskrit
and Bengali (including the Krittivasa Ramayana, a devotional
text still extremely popular today) narrate how hero-king Bhagiratha,
who brought the sacred river Ganga from heaven to earth, was
miraculously born to and raised by two co-widows, who made
love together with divine blessing. These texts explain his
name Bhagiratha from the word bhaga (vulva) because he was
born of two vulvas.
Another sacred text, the fourth-century Kama Sutra, emphasizes
pleasure as the aim of intercourse. It categorizes men who
desire other men as a “third nature,” further subdivides
them into masculine and feminine types, and describes their
lives and occupations (such as flower sellers, masseurs and
hairdressers). It provides a detailed description of oral sex
between men, and also refers to long-term unions between men.
Hindu medical texts dating from the first century C.E. provide
taxonomies of gender and sexual variations, including same-sex
desire.
Most modern Hindus are ignorant of this rich history, and believe
the popular myth that homosexuality was imported into India
either from medieval West Asia or from modern Euro-America.
It is symptomatic of this ignorance that the democratic and
secular Indian government has retained the British law criminalizing
sodomy. The Indian LGBT movement is now challenging this law
as unconstitutional.
Modern trends and views. Indian Hindus living
in the U.S. maintain strong ties with India. Although influenced
by modern homophobia
they are also exposed to LGBT movements and literature. There
are now many Indian LGBT groups in the U.S. and India, most
of whose members are Hindu in origin. Trikone, the LGBT South
Asian magazine published from San Francisco since 1986, carries
many essays on Hinduism and homosexuality.
Rightwing Hindu groups, active both in India and the U.S.,
who aim to remake Hinduism as a militant nationalist religion,
express virulent opposition to homosexuality, inaccurately
claiming that it was unknown to ancient Hindus.
However, several modern Hindu teachers, who draw on traditional
concepts of the self as genderless, emphasize that all desire,
homosexual or heterosexual, is the same, and that aspirants
must work through and transcend desire. Thus, when Swami Prabhavananda
(1893-1976), founder of the Vedanta society in the U.S., heard
of Oscar Wilde’s conviction, he remarked, “Poor
man. All lust is the same.”
Hindu philosopher Jiddu Krishnamurti (1895-1986), who set up
a center in Ojai, California, said that homosexuality, like
heterosexuality, has been a fact for thousands of years and
becomes a problem only because humans over-focus on sex. When
asked about homosexuality, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar (born 1956),
founder of the international movement, Art of Living, said, “Every
individual has both male and female in them. Sometimes one
dominates, sometimes other, it is all fluid.”
Mathematician Shakuntala Devi, in her 1977 book, The World
of Homosexuals, interviewed Srinivasa Raghavachariar, head
priest of the Srirangam temple. He said that same-sex lovers
must have been cross-sex lovers in a former life. The sex may
change but the soul retains its attachments, hence the love
impels these souls towards one another. In 2002, I interviewed
a Shaiva priest who performed the marriage of two women; he
told me that, having studied Hindu scriptures, he had concluded, “Marriage
is a union of spirits, and the spirit is not male or female.”
As Amara Dasa, a Krishna devotee and founder of Gay and Lesbian
Vaishnava Association (GALVA), notes in his recent book, Tritiya-Prakriti:
People of the Third Sex, several Gaudiya Vaishnava authorities
emphasize that since everyone passes through various forms,
genders and species in a series of lives, we should not judge
each other by the material body but view everyone equally on
a spiritual plane, and be compassionate as God is.
Gay activist Ashok Row Kavi recounts that when he was studying
at the Ramakrishna Mission, a monk told him the Mission was
not a place to run away from himself, and that he should live
boldly, ignoring social prejudice. Row Kavi went on to found
the Indian gay magazine Bombay Dost. In 2004, Hindu right-wing
leader K. Sudarshan denounced homosexuality. Row Kavi, identifying
himself as “a faithful Hindu,” wrote an open letter
to Sudarshan in the press. He asked Sudarshan to read ancient
Hindu texts, and noted that modern homophobia is a Western
import.
Despite these enlightened opinions, there is little discussion
of the issue in most Hindu religious communities. Consequently,
some teachers and most lay followers remain homophobic, which
has driven many gay disciples out of religious communities
and some, both in India and the U.S., even to suicide.
Indian newspapers, over the last 25 years, have reported several
same-sex weddings and same-sex joint suicides, mostly by Hindu
female couples in small towns, unconnected to any gay movement.
Several weddings took place by Hindu rites, with some family
support, while the suicides resulted from families forcibly
separating lovers. In a forthcoming book Love’s Rite:
Same-Sex Marriage in India and the West, Ruth Vanita analyzes
these phenomena, which suggest the wide range of Hindu attitudes
to homosexuality today.
The millennia-long debate in Hindu society, somewhat suppressed
in the colonial period, has revived. In 2004, Hinduism
Today reporter Rajiv Malik asked several Hindu swamis (teachers)
their opinion of same-sex marriage. The swamis expressed a
range of opinions, positive and negative. They felt free to
differ with each other; this is evidence of the liveliness
of the debate, made possible by the fact that Hinduism has
no one hierarchy or leader. As Mahant Ram Puri remarked, “We
do not have a rule book in Hinduism. We have a hundred million
authorities.”
(Ruth Vanita is the author of Same-Sex Love in India: Readings
from Literature and History, and Love’s Rite: Same-Sex
Marriage in India and the West)
|